Gays : To all Singapore Religious Leaders

last SG · 2007-11-06T15:52:04+00:00

Yes, good or bad sometimes depend on the situations.But there are obective standards for an act too. Drinking bear can be considered good because the drink...

Icemoon SG

Depending on how you want to see it.

Do you think it makes sense to say drinking coffee is correct and tea is wrong?

However you cannot say because someone thinks that way, he or she is delulsional.

Furthermore I believe PRP is not trying to impose his view. All he wants is a discussion. If you think he is only stating preferences like coffee and tea, then tell him kindly. Everybody should have stopped long ago.

happieman SG

PRP is an extremist - i guess all ppl will agree with me.

Icemoon - he is more cunning.. he is making use of PRP. by defending PRP, he will get one more allies cos PRP is stupid enuf of not awaring he is being made use by Icemoon.

The rest is very clear, the neutralists and pro-gays defend gays, the anti-gay keep attacking gays. As simple as that.

Further debates are useless.

happieman SG

PRP is an extremist - i guess all ppl will agree with me.

Icemoon - he is more cunning.. he is making use of PRP. by defending PRP, he will get one more allies cos PRP is stupid enuf of not awaring he is being made use by Icemoon.

The rest is very clear, the neutralists and pro-gays defend gays, the anti-gay keep attacking gays. As simple as that.

Further debates are useless.

ms_ok SG

hey icemoon, you are too obvious in supporting PRP la. your scheme has been seen and pointed out already.
you should think of other strategy, and work hard ! jia you !

Ms Ok

Icemoon SG

show evidence that i have supported him. Wink

ms_ok SG

you are zhuan(1) niu(2) jiao(3) jian(1)

i can see it even when i am a newcomer of this thread.

Icemoon SG

so zhuan niu jiao jian means I supported him?

Icemoon SG

So I take it that you have read from page 1 to 40?

happieman SG

it means you have to go back and read all your messages again 3 times, and you will find the evidence

happieman SG

you are such a failure ... no one is supporting you ..

happieman SG

prove that you are an idiot ..

stupidissmart SG

The tone in which u talk to PRP is significantly different from the way you speak to other people. Typically u tell him not to debate simply because he is right and u felt the other people are not worth listening to his words. U are supporting him. U can deny all you want but the impression sticks. If u deny it, then u prove yourself to be an insincere person who don’t mean wat u say and u get rid of PRP to avoid implicating yourself in

happieman SG

PRP is an extremist - i guess all ppl will agree with me.

Icemoon - he is more cunning.. he is making use of PRP. by defending PRP, he will get one more allies cos PRP is stupid enuf of not awaring he is being made use by Icemoon.

The rest is very clear, the neutralists and pro-gays defend gays, the anti-gay keep attacking gays. As simple as that.
Further debates are useless.

Zarks SG

This stupidissmart already explained what you typed here in detail. Mayb Icemoon you should re-read again what you typed instead of asking ppl for proof cuz at last it is you who make a fool of yourself

ms_ok SG

i agree that Icemoon should not keep asking people for proof, as the evidence lies in his own message. this is quite clear.

Ms_Ok

happieman SG

Precisely, Icemoon is making a fool out of himself in this thread

happieman SG

you see Ms Ok, Icemoon is running away ...

haha what a coward !!

Icemoon SG

You guys are right that I'm supporting him. I feel he has a right to bring forth his view in a civilised manner and expect more civilised replies. Seen this way, I'm sure you guys can find many evidence that I'm standing on his side during the debate.

However the similarity ends here. If you are talking about the gay issue, I don't think you can exactly call me standing on his side. After all our points are as different as it can be. I don't think I harped on whether sodomy is right or wrong.

Icemoon SG

I'm asking for evidence that I'm standing on his side regarding his views about the debate.

If 'standing on his side' means I am not thrashing him like you guys, then obviously I'm standing on his side. This I do not deny.

« Previous Page Next Page »