I got something to say here.PAP lickers, supporters, lackey,
fans, all sorts of name you can name them on... they like to put
this words in their mouth to shut our mouth...
"Look at Indonesia, Vietam, Philiphines...,they are so backward
compare to our country.We should be fortune to live in a PAP
controlled Singapore.We got jobs, tight secrurity and enough to eat
and sleep.We should thanks the PAP for bring our country from the
third world country to the first world country."
Ok, all of you out there please debate here, if you agree to
what the above statement is..., lan lan!
If you don't agree, please kindly tell us why?Or please use your
brain and think of a damn solid answer to counter them back
My answer to these lackeys --->>>
There was a PAP lackey whose son is taking
examination.One day his son came back
telling him that he scored 50% instead of 80% marks in
his exam.His son was happy but not him.The father scolded him,
heh you... why you score so little?You should score higher or
better! Why not aim for the 80%!The son try to think of a way
to answer back and finally he said:
"Father, why should i aim for the 80% if most of my classmates
scored less then mine!You should be grateful to me because at least
i am the only one who score the passing grade that is 50%!
Father, you always tell me must be grateful to the government
that we are not those third world country.At least we got to work
and eat.So, why complain?Father, so why complain if i did more
better than my classmate???"
To all of you out there, this is the story i going to share with
you.The kind of government who always like to compare us with those
Philipines, Indonesia... Vietam...ect!So as to shut our mouth out
on their policies!!!
I would indeed be happy if I was the only person in the class
who scored a passing grade. That's your analogy isn't it?
If you constantly score better than your peers, the numerical
value of your grade is pretty meaningless.
As for the massive pap-haters on these forums, I really want to
say something to you all. Think about problems in their original
forms, and not allow the views of your favourite political party to
sway your own.
Especially telling was the thread awhile ago where everyone was
claiming the government was to blame for a freak accident involving
a falling branch. If the branch came from the tree planted on the
grounds of, say, ren ci hospital, the tune would not be the
same.
Yet, logically it should be. Blame is blame. Innocence is
innocence. The target should not influence your judgement. There's
a reason justice is blindfolded.
Just because on some level we agree with what the PAP says does
not make us sellouts. It does not mean we don't want improvement.
Sometimes, that's all it is...that PAP is actually making
sense.
The cliche that everyone makes mistakes holds true in reverse.
Even the blind squirrel will occasionally find the nuts. Is it that
hard to believe that SOMETIMES, PAP might be right? Do you have to
automatically condemn everything that party says? If so, how are
you different from PAP in silencing the competition?
