Are you able to tell me who took up the 172,400 jobs created

maggot SG

I'm not inside for sure Sad

qlqq9 SG

You are just one of the many who are not. Hope you get better luck next time.

eagle SG

Please note that I have apologized for comparing you with that scum Gazelle. Is that not enough?

Please, as I have already said, your replies to my figures and calculations are
1) I have more working experience than you
2) This is what I have seen, so I must be right

So in your opinion, do you think those replies are reasonable? If it is reasonable, how about getting someone with even say 40 years of working experience to talk to you? To tell you because he has much more years of working experience than you, he is definitely more right than you? You want to talk reason with me by claiming I'm unreasonable, yet
1) you could not point out which post is unreasonable?
2) your arguments are unreasonable as pointed above?

How sure are you that students nowadays do not face challenges from foreign students? Do you know how many top 5 JCs spots or how many Dean's List placement are snatched by foreign students each year? Do you seriously think that challenges by foreigners are only in the working world and not in school? If you think so, then you are outdated.

In addition, do you seriously think students do not complain about foreign students snatching the As, given that it is marked by a bell curve? The problem with people like you is that you think problems faced by you in the working world against foreigners are not faced by students in school.

I have time and again challenged you to point out how my posts were unreasonable and not objective, and you have constantly failed to do so. Why? Because you are levying a charge from nothing? Baseless allegations?

reddressman SG

Dun worry, the adult matured and unnaive forummers will forgive your senseless remarks.

eagle SG

Why? Can't point out any senseless post from me till you just have to levy a direct charge? I can seriously compare some similarities between his way of posting and Gazelle's way of posting. Do you want to hear the analysis too?

Still not ready to poll the forumers on whose posts are senseless? Or are the opinions only yours and qlqq9? And why quote halfway? Not able to answer the remaining queries below? Or not willing to accept it again?

Seriously, both you and qlqq9 are levying charges without any proof. Isn't that against this forum's guidelines? For proof, please refer to the other thread. And let's continue in the other thread so that there are no parallel threads

qlqq9 SG

Happy, we let you win, so still wanna keep going on to be a pain? You win. However, those people with years and years of working experience know what is going on. You don't need to resort to be such a pain just becos you can't accept that people cannot accept your points --> from here, we see a part of GAzelle in you.

qlqq9 SG

Friend, this fellow is still in the stage of growing up. Many times many of those in the stage of growing up love to prove they are right (without having thoughts about reality and facts of life)and so forth by not knowing that it takes lots of "she hui jing yan" for one to know the truth. Gazelle will continue, persistently acts as a pain in the neck when people disagree with him, and I see this in eagle.

eagle SG

You haven't answer my question of pointing out which part of my post disagree with your observations

Similarities between you and gazelle
1) Misunderstand posts
2) Use such personal attack tactics to avoid answering questions. With so many doubtful questions asked to you, what you had done is simply just avoid all. Is that any different from gazelle?
3) Talking rubbish without proof other than your own 2 eyes.
4) Acting knowledgeable when in fact you claimed that you don't know figures and all your knowledge came from only what you have seen, not what you have researched, thought and analyzed.

Please qlqq9, if you cannot answer related questions above, no need to talk like you are the know-all. I based my posts on my research and analysis, you didn't.

eagle SG

Do you seriously think this is about winning? If you are not here for a debate or discussion, why do you post in this forum in the first place?

And you have yet to answer me, how many years of experience had you exactly? How many employees have you exactly seen, and how many percentage is that of the Singapore labour force?

And think carefully, if you would be as magnanimous as you have claimed to let me win, why would you continue to address me in your post? I'm discussing points with reddressman, not you.

Finally, how do you think my posts disagree with your observations? Can you even answer this simple question?

eagle SG

Finally, qlqq9, I shall quote this from teraexa to angel7030 from another thread to illustrate my point again:

qlqq9 SG

Wow, gotta copy from the cute, down to earth and kind angel. Angel is a nice sweet lady whom I know before we came here. Run out of words, must make use of angel's words. Tell you, angel in her own way is mature and say and observe things and situations as they are, no figures or numbers for her to fight all the way to be a pain to get on people.

When angel asks me to tell her more, I tell and she is so dai fang to accept it without being a pain to keep finding fault, you are different. Such is what I called a mature person.

qlqq9 SG

I shall not satisfy your desire to make things difficult for me by answering your questions any more. I had in the beginning attended to your request but after that what I get from you is nothing but vicious attitude and all the fault finding starts. If you enjoy giving people hell that is fine with me, I see your are just a kid trying very hard to grow up. This is just part of your growing pain at the expense of myself and reddressman.

qlqq9 SG

Nobody misunderstand your post, just because we don't agree you conveniently suit yourself to say that I misunderstand your posts. Your tactic failed.

Spartans SG

You had misunderstood some of my posts before and slammed me for it.

I am bemused then by your unexpected/unprovoked attacks.

qlqq9 SG

So do you want to take revenge by siding eagle the one who is going through growing pain? Yes, please write down and remember to get at me if you want to practise pettiness. I was misunderstood by people in other forums but I don't bear grudge and bring it up in other's thread. If you want to take revenge, do so, come attack me.

I don't think I misunderstand eagle's posts. I said I am not for one who base on figures and numbers, it is facts and reality that are true. This thread is about who took up the jobs not how many.

qlqq9 SG

It is irrelevant for you to bring it up in this thread, if you so much bear the grudge PM me and attack me. Happy, satisfied?

Spartans SG

No I am not unhappy or whatever. See you misunderstood my post again. I am just telling you that you may have misread or misunderstand some of the forumers (eg eagle) posts.

okok treat I nv say anything before.

qlqq9 SG

When I find that by using figures and numbers to reply to the thread topic is irrelevant you said I may have misread or misunderstand. Don't be nasty in the subtle manner, if you are kind just stay out of this. How kind are you, you are starting to stir up something for eagle to be even more aggressive? Don't pretend to be nice if you are not. Mr. Green

qlqq9 SG

Hey, you are making use of eagle to subtlely get at me. Stop your nuisance.

Spartans SG

okok relax.

The whole thing is that you formed your argument on the basis of your experience and observation.

Eagle, being an undergrad, based his argument on figures and statistic.

It is common that personal observations and official figures do not tally.

Ok back to the main topic, of the 172,400 jobs created, I believe an significant number of them went to foreigners/ foreign students who graduated in local uni/ foreigners turned PR or citizens.

It is just my personal observation from everyday's life and the media.

Merry Christmas everyone.

« Previous Page Next Page »