Yes you did.
Mathematics have proven that your statement "If there is no proof
or evidence, its delusional" applies to Ethics
Since you can't prove ethics, ethics is a delusion to you.
Want more?
1) Philosophies are subjective. There is no one single philosophy
that is correct or wrong
2) Ethics is a philosophy. Therefore Ethics is subjective.
3) Science, with its requirement for proof or evidence, is
objective
4) Andrew's statement, "If there is no proof or evidence, its
delusional", means in Mathematics that ANYTHING that has no proof
or evidence is delusional.
5) Since Ethics is subjective, it cannot be proven by any
scientific method, therefore based on point (4), ethics is
delusional.
No wonder you cannot understand something called Respect of Fellow
Humans (which is an ethic), since Ethics to you is delusional. With
your rude and obnoxious behavior, no matter how good you are with
your head at certain fields, you will never be able to succeed in
whatever you do, coz you do not respect others.
Feel free to argue some more. You CANNOT win Mathematics. And to
date, aside from ranting about how good Science is, you haven't
shown yourself to know any field of Science at all.
Go ahead to 
or 
, that's all you can contribute to this
thread. Stupidity at its absolute, arguing against Mathematics. Its
like saying 1+1 is not 2 but its 3. hahaha
