and how do you know a finding or opinion is wrong when you still
do not know its wrong yet?
A bit of a chicken and egg issue isn't it?
Science has always been about trial and research and trial and
research. What's correct today, may not be correct several years
later.
Beware of how you assume things, like for instance, your dangerous
statement that the Church does not believe in Science. For example,
I never did say I DO NOT believe in Science. The more correct
approach I adopt is, I never believe BLINDLY in Science, I am
always open to the idea that Science can be wrong.
Again, you have not replied to my question to you. What is YOUR
definition of Science? As far as I am concerned, Science is
HUMAN-DRIVEN, and therefore there's no such thing as Science exists
before Man. Without Man, there is no Science, because no one can
work on discoveries and research to produce all that we have
now.
If Science cannot prove that Ghosts exist now, does it mean ghosts
don't exist?