Believe in science & ethics

last SG · 2007-08-17T14:02:49+00:00

The scope of science is very wide.It includes social sciences such as sociology,psychology and politics.

soul_rage SG

so funny. You sound more and more unable to defend yourself.

In the outside world, once you made a statement, anything later to say "Oh, I din mean that", is called damage control.

If you really don't understand the above, don't worry, you will learn it as you experience more of this world Smile

Many things, once said, cannot be taken back.

AndrewPKYap SG

and you are sounding more and more ridiculous... Why should I take back the statement that "Humans are like that...?" You are a great example of the "Humans that are like that" in my statement. Irrational and delusional, imagining that the delusions in your head are also in other people's head.

Why did you have to edit my post and add the word ALL? After you add the word ALL, you turn around and accuse me for your own stupidity in adding the word ALL? Mr. Green

soul_rage SG

*shrugs*
As a pretender who don't understand Science and keep bringing in new assumptions to protect yourself, you are like the mosquito, really noisy Smile

Once again, its not the whole point of argument about no better way. The idea is that Science cannot be 100% correct, and it allows the person to keep an open mind.

When I was a tutor in the university, I found a mistake in the model answer, and deliberately still put up the incorrect model answer, and then ask my students if the answer is correct.

Only 1 dared to think and challenge the answer I put up. The rest accepted the wrong answer as the correct answer. My lesson to them then was to learn how to question, and learn how to think beyond what is given to you. Even the tutor or the lecturer can be wrong.

The tutor or lecturer to the student then was like Science. They believe all answers are correct just because the professor is the most experienced in that field, and that answers after many semesters should not have any more errors.

soul_rage SG

ahhh... NOW you are changing your statement.

"Humans are like that..." becomes "Humans THAT are like that..."

Note that there is a huge difference between the two.

You really don't understand Science, lucky you do not represent the scientific community Smile

So answer the question. By not taking back your statement "Humans are like that", are you then agreeing that based on Mathematics, you are now agreeing that you are using the "ALL" phrase in that statement?

AndrewPKYap SG

and you are? a delusional that is unable to answer a very simple question, "What is the great proposal that you have that is better than the scientific method?" and yet thinks that he is very smart.

edited to add: Rolling Eyes

Mr. Green

soul_rage SG

I did not add the word "ALL"

here's your original statement again, in its full naked glory Very Happy

If you still don't understand why "Sharks are fish" = "All Sharks are fish", kindly ask those who understand Science better to explain to you.

soul_rage SG

haha, you are so funny

I did not propose anything. I did not say I am smart as well. I am just encouraging everyone to remember that

"Science is NOT 100% foolproof", and
(1) There are things which Science cannot explain
(2) There are things which Science explained, but later found to be incorrect.

AndrewPKYap SG

Are you lying or is this your post where you added the word ALL?

Originally posted by soul_rage: 19 September 2007 · 11:03 AM
In mathematics, you are saying [b]ALL humans are like that. And all human make the SAME stupid mistake, and since you never mentioned it is specific to Science, therefore you are implying ALL humans are making the SAME stupid mistake in general.[/b]

highlighting in bold the word ALL, by me. Rolling Eyes

AndrewPKYap SG

and so what is it that you proposed to replace the "NOT 100% foolproof science"?

If you cannot then what's the point of telling people that?

Even though it is not "NOT 100% foolproof " you have to trust scientific findings instead of the delusions in your own head simply because it is better than the delusions in your head. Rolling Eyes

soul_rage SG

Did you read that I wrote "You are saying.." ?

If this is not understandable, time for you to go for English lessons. I did not quote you. If I quoted you, and put the word "ALL" in front, I will accept that as my error graciously.

How about you, are you gracious in admitting that you don't understand Science at all, but instead goes around with a bad mouth insulting others?

soul_rage SG

As a pretender, I must say you really don't understand much don't you?

When you are in a box, you can either choose
1) To think out of the box (like what Einstein did)
2) To think within the box (question if the box has any faults)
3) Accept everything that you can see in the box

Researchers mostly do (2). You can choose to do (3), but I prefer to do (2) to understand more

AndrewPKYap SG

This is rich, you attack me first and then ask me not to go around "bad mouth insulting others" Rolling Eyes

I don't know anything about science? Then answer these questions oh Brilliant one.. instead of "bad mouth insulting others"....

and so what is it that you proposed to replace the "NOT 100% foolproof science"?

If you cannot then what's the point of telling people that? (that it is not foolproof)

and try invalidating this:

Even though it is not "NOT 100% foolproof " you have to trust scientific findings instead of the delusions in your own head simply because it is better than the delusions in your head. Rolling Eyes

soul_rage SG

Interesting, after what you said about Gazelle, your behavior is somewhat like him.

Calling others stupid (whether is it at me or others is irrelevant) is not insulting others?

For your questions, I have already replied in the previous posting, so I am puzzled why you keep harping on and on.

Or are you doing something Gazelle loves to do, diverting attention away from your mistakes, which you are not gracious enough to admit? Smile

soul_rage SG

some more questions for everyone to think about

Do you believe in Reiki or spiritual healing?
Do you believe in fengshui?
Do you believe in religion and of God, given that Science cannot prove God exists?

AndrewPKYap SG

You did not add the words ALL in those sentences? Liar (in that case, not that you are always lying)

AndrewPKYap SG

What exactly did I say about Gazelle? I hope you are not going to lie about that too when you tell us what exactly what I said about Gazelle and how it is relevant. Rolling Eyes

I asked to you to answer a couple of simple questions and instead of answering you talk about Gazelle.

Don't think you can escape/hide and run from answering the following questions:

BTW why did you feel the need to "encouraging everyone to remember that science is not 100% foolproof"? Were you fooled into thinking that science is 100% foolproof? Why were you so foolish as to believe that any human enterprise can be 100% foolproof? This is so basic. You should not think that just because you were fooled, others similarly are. Not everyone are fools.

Rolling Eyes

soul_rage SG

sigh... why do you not understand simple English?

Case 1:
If I QUOTED your statement, and ADDED a word "ALL", then yes, its something I should not do, and I will accept that graciously.

Case 2:
This is what I did, I am saying "You are saying", and wrote down my understanding of what you said. That is DIFFERENT, and is not an addition of the word "ALL", coz its my understanding of your statement.

If you had taken GP (General Paper), you will understand the difference. Do you or do you NOT understand the difference between a quotation and an understanding of a statement?

If you don't understand Cases 1 and 2, there is nothing else further to discuss with you, coz its useless to talk if you don't understand the simple parts of English

soul_rage SG

And I think its enough.

You have not added anything of use into the discussion except to go about like a mad man shouting.

I have already answered your questions in my previous postings. If you can't find it just like Gazelle always cannot find things he doesn't want to see, then so be it.

For a person who cannot understand simple English fully, its really sad to see you go about insisting you are right. If you are not gracious enough to admit it that you have made the statement implying "All humans are stupid", then there's nothing much left to speak with your kind.

By the way, your postings are slowly changing to try to mask your initial weaknesses. Am glad to see Darwin's evolution happening to you, at least that's a consolation Smile

AndrewPKYap SG

Gosh you made two long post of rubbish without answering the questions put to you. Shocked Rolling Eyes Twisted Evil

You need not be so ashamed that you have no answer to the questions, it is better to admit your stupidity than to try to mask it.

PRP SG

U go ahead to beleive your 6th sense, i believe few persons would follow you.The majority of the ppl believe science & scientific principles.

« Previous Page Next Page »