Facts on the ground more eloquent than statistics: Ngiam
Loh Chee Kong
[email protected]
MORE than four decades ago, former top civil servant Ngiam Tong Dow
then a young public officer in the Finance Ministry was tagging
along with former Deputy Prime Minister Dr Goh Keng Swee at a
high-level United Nations meeting in Thailand.
.
After dinner one day during the discussion at the Economic
Commission for Asia and the Far East, the minister insisted that a
bemused Mr Ngiam follow him on an evening walk through the streets
of Bangkok.
.
"After sweating up and down the hot and dusty pavements of the
street in front of our hotel, I plucked up enough courage to ask Dr
Goh what was the purpose of the exercise," said Mr Ngiam last
Saturday at the National University of Singapore's Economics Alumni
inaugural annual dinner. The event was attended by about 100 alumni
from various years.
.
As it turned out, Dr Goh widely regarded as Singapore's economic
wizard wanted to see "whether the shops were well stocked" in
order to satisfy himself with the economic statistics put forth by
the Bank of Thailand.
.
Mr Ngiam, now 70, also recalled how Dr Albert Winsemius,
Singapore's first economics adviser, got his grandson to plot the
changes in the number of job advertisements in the newspaper.
.
The chart his grandson produced "told him far more about the state
of the Singapore economy than all the economic statistics I
dutifully sent him each month", said Mr Ngiam.
.
Mr Ngiam was underlining the pitfalls of over-reliance on economic
statistics without reality checks, especially in today's age of
super-computers.
.
Another potential trap is how Singapore's "robust brand" of
economics could turn out to be myopic, said Mr Ngiam.
.
Questioning the Monetary Authority of Singapore's use of the
exchange rate as the key monetary policy instrument while
eschewing the interest rate as a tool Mr Ngiam said that
long-term growth could only be sustained by increases in
productivity.
.
While wages here have skyrocketed in the last few months,
economists have expressed concern over the sluggish growth in
productivity.
.
Describing the Republic's productivity performance as "mediocre",
Mr Ngiam pointed out how Singapore's Gross Domestic Product has
expanded "largely on infusions of foreign labour".
.
Said Mr Ngiam: "MAS' catchphrase in its half-yearly review is that
it will allow a modest appreciation of the Singapore dollar over
time. Such a policy stance is realistic only if there is steady
increase in our productivity growth."
.
And such shortsightedness has come back to haunt Singapore in some
instances, Mr Ngiam added.
.
For example, the ongoing retrofitting of lifts to stop on every
floor in HDB blocks is costing the Government "much more" than the
intended "marginal" savings when it decided in the early years that
the lifts should stop on alternate floors.
.
And even the top brains can sometimes be wrong as evidenced by
the "great MRT debate" of the mid-1970s, said Mr Ngiam.
.
Back then, a "powerful" team of Harvard economists assembled by the
Finance Ministry had argued for an all-bus transport network
instead of a bus-rail mass rapid transit system.
.
Dr Goh also argued that an all-bus system would be less risky than
the $5 billion MRT system as the bus fleets "can expand
incrementally bus by bus".
.
"It was a disruptive piece of reasoning," said Mr Ngiam, who had
argued for a rail-based network on the basis that it would provide
access to the whole island and push up property prices.
.
"The increase in the collection of property taxes would probably
pay for the total cost of $5 billion to build the initial system,"
said Mr Ngiam, who added that the Government's final decision to
build the MRT has been vindicated.
.
Reiterating that population issues are the most pressing concerns,
cutting across the social, economic and political spheres, Mr Ngiam
said he feared that "the tipping point of procreation has been
reached" and falling birth rates "cannot be easily reversed".
.
While he confessed that he was "not clued up enough" to have a
complete understanding of the current population policy, Mr Ngiam
repeated his concern which he first made in a People's Action
Party newsletter last month that Singapore should not be obsessed
with bumping up the population for economic purposes, given the
advances in technology and education standards.
.
Said Mr Ngiam: "The civil service is more adept at achieving
quantitative than qualitative targets. Topping up our population en
masse with immigrants may well create a population base larger than
what our economy can sustain."