PM denies vote buying after grants audit
By Sandra O'Malley, Melissa Jenkins and Maria Hawthorne
November 15, 2007 08:01pm
Article from: AAP
PRIME Minister John Howard's re-election chances have been dealt a
blow by a damning report which finds the regional grants program
has been used for pork-barrelling in Coalition electorates.
Just over a week out from polling day, and with a new poll showing
little reduction in Labor's lead, the Coalition's reputation for
economic management has been called into question in a scathing
report by Auditor-General Ian McPhee.
The report is critical of the administration of the Regional
Partnerships Program (RPP) and says ministers often went against
public servants' advice by giving money to Coalition
electorates.
And in one 90-minute period on the eve of the 2004 federal election
campaign, parliamentary secretary De-Anne Kelly rushed through
approvals for 16 projects worth more than $3.3m.
Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd said the report revealed another
example of an arrogant and out-of-touch Government which had used
taxpayer funds to buy votes in the run-up to the 2004
poll.
And Mr Howard may face further fall-out with one of his senior
advisers, Peter Langhorne, an ex-chief of staff to former Nationals
leader John Anderson, caught up in the row.
Mr Langhorne was found to have had a role in pushing for funding
for an ethanol plan in Gunnedah, in Mr Anderson's electorate of
Gwydir, even though the project was assessed as high-risk.
Mr McPhee examined $400m allocated by the Government's
controversial RPP between 2003 and 2006 and found it fell short of
"an acceptable standard of public administration".
His three-volume, 1200-page report found dozens of instances where
ministers had overridden departmental recommendations to give the
tick to projects in Coalition electorates.
And in many instances, ministers blocked grants in Labor seats even
though the department deemed them worthy.
Mr Rudd demanded the Prime Minister accept responsibility for the
pork-barrelling scandal.
"Mr Howard must today accept responsibility for the arrogant abuse
of this $328m program," Mr Rudd said.
"Mr Howard on the eve of an election must at least explain to the
Australian people how these abuses of a $328m taxpayer program have
occurred."
Of the $400m allocated to the program, only $328m was spent.
Mr Rudd said the report showed the Howard Government had arrogantly
ignored the advice of independent public servants and abused
taxpayers' dollars to get themselves re-elected in 2004.
"I presume they are doing the same again today," he said.