Is any one laughing at WP, SDA, or
even the NSP ?
Is the PKMS a joke as you have expected for WP, SDA and the NSP
?
SDP under CST was just as ineffective as SDA now is - even if CST
managed to keep his seat by the good grace of the MIW.
Since CST entered politics by standing in Cairnhill against the
late Lim Kim San, he had never strike anyone as impressive.
It took another four more attempts before CST made any headway,
then again, his success had always not been through his own
unimpressive efforts, but through sympathy votes as a result of
LKY's big mouth that derided CST educational qualification compared
to his MIW selection.
During the 2002 Election, CST barely managed to keep his
seat.
You are simply making a whipping boy out of CSJ due to your own
narrow feelings of personal disappointments.
yes he has... by his ineffectual and disgraceful antics and
publicity stunts, he has squandered the finite pool of public
sympathy and attention so that in future, if and when there are
important issues brought up by non-MIW people, it will be looked at
and dismissed because the SDP and CSJ has cried wolf too many
times...
Your reasons seem rather hollow
considering that Steve Chia as an NMP had made an impact in
Parliament despite CSJ's continuous disappointing antics that ran
parallel to Steve Chia's performance in Parliament.
Even Low Thia Kiang and Sylvia Lim were more impressive then CST -
inspite of CSJ's dismal performance at politics.
Are your assessment and views consistent with the actual events, or
are you simply building a mole hill from a few scraps of leftover
mud ?
but my disgust for him aside.. what has he done for Singapore
lately other than cry to foreigners for sympathy? because he'll get
none, or worse, he'll get fake sympathy and foreigners will use him
to gain political advantage for themselves... there is no such
thing as a free lunch.. whatever it is out there in the political
world, they WILL do so only if their actions further their own
agenda...
If you believe that there is no
free lunch, and that in the political world - every politicians
will do so only if their actions further their own agenda - you
should qualify the differences in the personality involved.
Wrapping every character in the same wrapper will dishonor the more
selfless politicians in the like of Sun Yat Sen, Ghandi, Mandela,
George Washington, and other freedom fighters of their
stature.
Then again, how could you even hope to appreciate such selfless
values when none exist in a warp mind that is more interested in
fabricating dishonest fantasies despite the factual events that
transpired.
If you do not wish to see positive acts from the efforts of anyone,
can anyone force you to observe any positive outcome from those
CSJ's supposed negative actions ?
LKY's despotic actions have been condemned since the before even
CSJ was born, with Singapore being kicked out of the Democrat
Socialist International Movement in the mid-1970s.
Throughout the 1970s and into the 1980s, with CSJ still in school,
LKY and Singapore has been constantly in the negative spotlight of
Amnesty International, the various US and UK publishing houses, and
the various Law Societies and Legal Bodies that include the Privy
Council - all of which had taken LKY to task for his ruthless use
of Law to suppress legitimate alternative political voices from the
likes of JBJ, Francis Seow, Tang Liang Hong, as well as the Law
Society, and even from the Catholic Church.
Did CSJ contributed to the negative views and criticism directed at
Singapore during the 1970s and 1980s ?
and hey.. if you believe otherwise, you're more naive and ignorant
than you look...
How do you even know how I look,
or if I am naive or ignorant ?
On the contrary, have you seriously look at your own position after
you have been consistently exposed - more then twice - for your
preferred venomous personal position towards CSJ, that is void of
objectivity in opinion, with a purposefully dishonest approach at
ignoring actual events that transpired but preferring to fabricate
your own version of a back-stabbing theory that is based on sheer
fantasy.
Can you be taken seriously ?
CSJ is spoken of like some kind of clown out there... because he
is..
Unfortunately, the view is held
only by your own narrow personal bias and preferred dishonesty
towards yourself and others in handling the facts.
contine below
