Dialogue on CPF reforms focuses on whys and hows of
changes
By Asha Popatlal, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 23 September 2007 2018
hrs
SINGAPORE: A dialogue session on Sunday with Prime Minister Lee
Hsien Loong and five ministers focused on the hows and whys of the
recent CPF changes.
Issues like why the interest rate hike was just 1 percentage point
and why there was no opt-out clause for the annuity were brought up
and addressed.
To provide life-long income to those who may live beyond 85, the
government has announced plans to set aside a sum of money from
each individual's minimum sum to buy into a compulsory annuity for
all CPF members.
If one dies before age 85, the amount goes into the pool
and the payouts for those who are still living.
However, it seems that many Singaporeans are having trouble coming
to grips with the idea of living long enough to enjoy the benefits
of the scheme.
Goh Aik Kiang, a grassroots leader, said: "Right now, my
observation is that there is a percentage of people who don't
really believe they will go beyond 85."
Labour chief Lim Swee Say, in typical tongue-in-cheek fashion, then
tried to address the issue with what he called "his fortune-telling
ability".
The Secretary-General of NTUC said: "I can tell you for sure, half
of you will die before 85 - half of you will live beyond 85... what
I cannot tell you is whether (it is) this half or that half."
It is the harsh reality of statistics that has prompted the changes
to ensure that Singaporeans have enough funds for their retirement.
But issues like the annuity have raised concerns about
fairness.
Goh Keng Hwa, another grassroots leader, said: "It's likely that
this programme, as it is, would result in taking away money from
those who are poor and sick, and giving to the wealthy and
well-to-do. The reason I say that is because people who live up to
85 and beyond are likely to be those (who are) healthy and
well-to-do, people who are poor and sick are likely to be
compromised, since everybody contributes."
Manpower Minister Ng Eng Hen said: "Professionals calculate which
groups live longer and if they do live longer, they have to pay a
higher premium. The number one rule be fair to everyone. So if
you want to be fair to everyone, then each person must put aside in
the CPF savings so that if you live longer than expected, you can
take care of yourself. Because if you don't do that, then those who
have put enough to support themselves will have to support you
that's not fair."
To the suggestion that the government should just step in and help
old people with funding when their money runs out, the Second
Finance Minister said he felt that was a slippery slope.
Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said: "The way we are doing now
we help people build up their savings, we give them incentive to
save. If you save, we will help you even more, but if we say we
will promise to pay if you run out of money, then what will happen
over time? People will save less because they know somebody is
waiting there, a grand-daddy waiting there to pay up if you run out
of money."
Re-employment beyond the age of 62 was another big issue.
Making the distinction between re-employment and simply increasing
the retirement age, Mr Lim said re-employment could mean a
different job with a different pay that may not be stressful for
the older worker.
The scheme also had the added bonus of preventing resentment from
younger workers who could climb the corporate ladder and not be
blocked by older workers who would simply stay on in their
positions.
Mr Lim said NTUC has been working with 300 companies over the last
18 months, and so far, 3,200 Singaporeans who have reached the age
of 62 were re-employed.
- CNA/so
1. What is the POOL about?
2. Was it ever there before?
3. Does having the Pool means whatever amount YOU have yet to
withdraw at the time of your DEATH will not go to your family but
will reside in the Pool to be used for paying out cpf to those who
still not dead? If so, what does this imply the meaning of 'YOUR
CPF MONEY' ? Can I set a will to have any of my cpf not yet
withdrawn to be distributed to my nominated surviving family
members , if I could not survive to 85? If not, WHY ? I hope to
hear answer from also the MAJORITY. You are so cute.
Any reply would be greatly appreciated.