If I'm not mistaken, csj's basis for disobeying "unjust" laws is
mirroing the argument given by Martin Luther King. It's based very
much on the legal theory of natural law as opposed to that of legal
positivism. Still, Martin Luther King's arguments had substance,
and there was a glaring human rights infringement then.
For csj's case, i truly have no idea what he's barking about. IMHO,
he seems to be barking for the sake of barking. Yes, we do need
opposition to keep the government on their toes, but to do it in
this way...
As for the international stance, i think he's trying hard to ally
with the more educated and influential segments of society through
projecting an image of a cosmopolitan Sg that is extremely in-tune
with the leading first-world countries.
He's basically getting things all wrong.
