PAP's political or governing philosophy is in the final analysis
despite all the claims to the contrary is "to tax, recover costs of
governing with whatever means at their disposal in the name of
avoiding welfarism and hoard taxes, as surpluses enabling them to
do as they like like buying votes with material benefits which
perpetuate their rule.
Opposition parties do not yet to come up with any governing
philosophy.
If oppositions are to to take over the rule from the PAP they
should make known their governing philosophy such as " to tax
reasonably to provide for basic needs and services without
profiteering on such services and maximize whatever tax monies they
collect and surpluses created to benefit the people e.g. building
up their retirement funds, medical needs and lowering costs of
living and creating jobs for the citizens."
Monies spent on foreigners and foreign investments under such a
governing philosophy will be eventually returned in the form of
endowment funds to support various needs of the people, job
creations and lowering costs of living or doing business"
In this way citizens will be looked after and monies from taxes and
surpluses will be put to good use where the mouth is instead of
being spent on extravagant projects, self-rewards or lost in
overseas unwarranted self-glory ventures like shin corp or suzhou
which do not truly benefit the people.
Given this alternative governing philosophy, any opposition party
wishing to form the government on such agenda will easily accepted
by the people who will no doubt support such wisdom.
When the day comes, there is no doubt that PAP will lose its power
which is basically one of enriching themselves and the elites and
talking about rewarding talents and keeping themselves
indirectly.
Such an opposition will find its thinking miles ahead with ability
to energize and motivate people as they will treat people as the
centre and all policies and will put monies and taxes to good use
instead of rewarding only the rich and controlling people's freedom
and undermining democracy to perpetuate their self-centred control
philosophy.