Why are you so anxious to have me
agree with you, and at the same time being so desparate to prove my
contradiction ?
Read again your post carefully, and you will note that I have only
stated your
claim - ''Muslims
are not represented'' is FALSE - did I
agree anything ?
To prove that your statement is FALSE - I went on to
say that ''the fact that Muslims
are not WELL
represented is due to .....
Now, HOW did you so cleverly conclude that I have agreed and then
contradict myself by disagreeing ?
Anyway,then you say it is the fault of the Muslim for following the
Third World Coutnry Imams,,is that right.
Then you say that theya re taught to follow mideval teaching and
rote learning.
Well most countries in the world are third wolrd,but does that
inhibit learning?
b]
Most Third World Countries that
are NOT ISLAMIC and DO NOT have any Muslims have been able to pull
themselves from their backwardness as they are not wasting time in
rote learning ancient Medievial Values; nor are their progress
being held back by any narrow Medievial Religious restrains or
constrains from progressing in Scientific and Industrial
knowledge.
[b]
Also since the "third world" imam are from Arabia and thus they
speak far more and have greater knowledge of Islamic teachings,you
blame the adherent of the religion to follow the source?
What is the use of an Imam from
Arabia - or from any other Islamic Third World country - with their
ability to [i]''speak far more and have greater knowledge of
Islamic teachings'' - in preparing the World Citizens to
face this 21st Century of Scientific and Industrial challenges
?
May i ask,do you blame Buddhist when they ask for a religious man
who dont even share the smae language wiht them?
you have been round Singapore and i am sure you have heard of the
mantras,,do you understand them?
Do the Buddhist impose their
existence onto the larger community, or DEMAND that the Law of the
Land be replaced by Buddhist Rules of Ethics - in the manner that
Muslims demand that Shariah Law takes precedence over Secular Laws
?
Even Thailand - with a population that has a majority of its
Citizens being Buddhist - has secular laws, and do not dictate
Buddhist values onto its Citizens nor anyone from any
Religion.
Why will you want to question if I will care to even blame the
Buddhist - who will not intrude into my space and affect any of my
human senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, intellect,
justice, and all higher levels of human and animalistic senses and
instincts ?
o in your view,it is plain wrong to ask a foreigner to teach about
reliogn despite the fct that it started from their land? and thier
language?
How about Bahia faith? do you also condemn that language?
Or the LAtin Mass,do you understand Latin?
Also,when you say that Islam Imam are of midevail times,,can you
tell me dont every other reliogn?
When you went to school did you learn of Buddha of Midevail
times,,or Siddharta?
When you are taught of Prophet Jesus as were you taught of Propeht
Jesus as in midevail times or now?
It is surprising snce most holy book are still in the olden
language but you condmen Islamic Imam? LOL
Unlike Islam, all other Religions
have seen their Religiious Leaders bring their people to appreciate
a set of value systems that are relevant to
the demands of modern times.
Even in totally Islamic Countries - what has the Imams done to
assist their faithful followers to meet the challenges of living in
a Globalised World in the 21st Century ?
Should I assume that your preferred reply already given so far - is
part of your Imam's guidance for Muslim to migrate, propagate
themselves with more babies then their hosts, then make small
innocuous moves but grow more strident with the Islamic demands as
the Muslim community grow in size, and dominate the host country
when the Muslim community have reach a critical mass in numbers
?
continue below