I am amazed that you will continue
with your useless line of delivery that is merely based on your
personal opinion.
You have been exposed countless times to be a ''fraud'', attempting to prove
yourself to be a ''larger than
life'' image, when you are no better than the size of a
Mushroom - making your pompous statements that are nothing more
than ''hot air emanating from an
empty can'' placed carelessly into a fire that you cannot
possibly control.
Do you seriously believe that you can redeem your worthless-self by
making these statements without any facts ?
Originally posted by oxford mushroom:
Far from it! Cause for culpability? No, I see plenty of cause for
defamation though..
Seriously, the view from a
Mushroom's perspective is such that the entire world is looming
over it, and there will be so many causes for your own small
size.
How valid are your views - from the point of a Mushroom that
perpetually think with a swollen head ?
Should we accept your position simply based on your personal
opinions without even a hollow theory - even without some light
weight facts based on some hollow premise ?
Your contemptuous attitude towards others is again revealed, and my
perception of you remains true to your preferred choice of being a
Mushroom - ''a swollen
imagination of yourself that is bigger than the mushroom head can
contain, and with the body that can hardly manage the weight of the
swollen light-head''.
Why should I sue you when I am not the subject of
defamation? The Ministers you defamed can, but I doubt they woul
dbe interested in some loser ranting in a forum.
You seem to have an unusual habit
of assuming the roles of the MIW - with your imagined assumption in
the parallel manner that the MIW will take towards imaginery
provocation.
Should I take it as your unique ability as a Mushroom to absorb all
of these traits of the MIW through your natural indiscriminate
parasitical abilities ?
Why would you want to threaten to sue, or even to second-guess what
the Ministers themselves would want to do ?
Are you now standing down your threat with a mere excuse that you
are not the subject of the imagined defamatory statements made in
this thread ?
Defamation can only be made when words are used without any
supporting facts.
Are you disputing the chronological record of events that
transpired as detailed in my postings in this thread ?
Why do you prefer to circumvent the crux of the issue but will
prefer to indulge in useless and unsubstantiated polemics ?
One can sue for any slightest imaginary defamatory provocation, and
it will take an independent court in the ''Real FIRST World'' that will find
your opinion to be hopelessly boorish to begin with.
Was Devan Nair found liable by a Canadian Court for his statement made about LKY,
and which stirred LKY's imagined reputation at being defamed
?
I have called you a ''Twirp'' for your disgusting
addiction to the ''foul
wind'' emitted by the MIW, and dispensing the same after
digesting a stomach full.
Am I defaming you by stating the obvious facts in this thread as
witnessed by every participant in this Speaker's Corner
?
