Originally posted by Atobe:
Is it not odd that
[b]twice you have avoided
addressing the crux of the weakness of a Religion
that has been ''hijacked by the
poor Human Interpretations'' of the ''Original Message''.
You avoided addressing the entire text in my opening remarks given
in my post in this thread, as well as in the other thread which you
had also started.
Actually i have already answrered you,it
was in red..
And i think you did read it casue you used the words "hijacked by
poor human interpretation"....and my aricle clearly say that it is
not Islamic.
No, there is nothing to agree or
disagree, as your original statement was simply
misleading
So you dont agree that people wont fight
for their desire?For land,honour,life and revenge?
Are you not attempting to justify the
killings from your clear references made to the Quran
?
Neither i nor the Quran justify it,may i
ask how did you come to that conclusion?
The supposed ''Words'' in the ''Great Book'' is supposedly from
''GOD'' as said by ''The Prophet'' - who is a ''Human''.
No one else were able to corrobrate those ''Words'' that ''The
Prophet'' said was from ''GOD'', and some of these ''Words'' were
supposedly recited from one generation to another since the
''Beginning of Time'' and 'BEFORE' the birth of ''The Prophet'';
and his contribution were added into the ''Great Book'' after his
own 'supposed Divine Experience with GOD'.
Even then these ''Words'' were NOT recorded into the ''written
works to form the Great Book'' until much later in the adult life
of The Prophet', with the writing effort ending in his death in
632A.D.
If - as you have mentioned - 'The Prophet' had compiled everything
into ONE Book, and since he is known to be illiterate and dependent
on others to write all the words into this ''Great Book'' - how can
this Book be NOT Man-Made when the whole exercise is an entirely
HUMAN EFFORT ?
It seems that you are misleading yourself with the wrong
understanding of the events that have led to the existence of the
''Great Book'', which even the Jews will not deny that theirs is
also a result of human writings, or that of the Christian Community
to their Bible - considering that the Judaism, Christianity and
Islam originate from one source.
I dont think you read my reply,the Quran
is compiled and finalized in the time of the Prophet Muhammad
saw.
And yes the Propeht Muhammad saw is but a man,"HUMAN".(wonder why
must you capitalize the word..LOL
The Prophet is illiterate,and every ramadhan he would recite the
entire Quran by heart,and he instructed the people how it is to be
arranged.
And yes the Quran is compiled by man,copied by man into many more
Quran,but the source of the words are from Allah.
If ''the Creator knows us well,'' and ''thus tell us to prohibit
from transgression..'' - should we then say that the ''Great Book''
written by the ''Human Hand'' has even dared to trangress the
Creator by illuding with ''the divine command to fight for peace
but never go to excess'' ?
Is this not a contradiction in your own understanding of the 'Great
Book''', and the inaccurate interpretation of the ''Original
Message'' ?
May i ask in what way is it conradictory,hope you can explain
yourself better.
Tell that to those Muslim Radicals in
Iraq who beheaded their hostages and prisoners while video
recording the process, and posting it on the internet.
Tell that to the
Islamic Radical in Pakistan who calmly sliced off the head
of a helpless journalist - Daniel Pearl, who was an American and an
ethnic Jew - with the entire process video recorded and sent for
broadcasting by the Arabic broadcast service.
continue below
If they say the Shahadah then they are
muslim,but are they following Islamic laws? No,so their action are
unIslamic.
[/b]
