Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:
They cannot take him to court because they have no basis on
which to bring him to court. They cannot accuse him of slander
because they would have to prove otherwise. Can they afford being
the next Durai?
Durai again? Haven't we had enough? young pap would have to prove
otherwise? Are you speaking on behalf of youngpap? How would you
know that they wouldn't be able to counter his arguments in court?
My guess is they've got more important things to do and their
priorities does not include taking a small fish to court.
A forum is meant to be a two way discussion. You have a
PRO, you have an Opposition. What kind of forum, what kind of
discussion is this if you only choose to hear what you wish to
hear? A cowards' place of gathering?
Exactly, i agree with that too, that's why i'm giving my point of
view as to why censorship on robert is not that big of a deal.
Censorship of the owner's website happens all the time, you can
even get censored from a blog, which happened to me too, no big
deal.
I am merely using your very words against you, for what you
said can be supportive of your arguments, as well as against the
very basis of your arguments...
I think the young pap is busy running away from critics and
concentrating on hoodwinking the other 66%... so what they do? They
choose the easiest way out. Ban the source...
like i said, young pap got better things to do than to waste their
time on empty vessels, who can blame them? I'm not pro pap either,
to them we are only noisy mosquitos. If you really want to be
heard, then you have to do something more drastic to get their
attention, going to their website and getting 'slapped' is just
futile and a waste of time.
Losers.[/b]
