It seem our distinquished judges think that imposing flogging is
just a question of number of strokes.It is very easy for them to
say 3, 10 or 24 strokes.Do they know what they have imposed on a
person?
Of course,the more serious the offence, the more the number of
stokes of floggings. But can u imagine imposing 24 strokes )the
maximum allowed under the law)?If there is no limit, i think our
judges may impose 100 stokes!
Since flogging is such a cruel punishment,as long as the criminal
given a few strokes of cane,i believe it should be sufficient
punishment for crimianls.What is the purpose of imposing large
number of strokes?
For example,stepdad raped his stepdaughter twice,he was give the
maximum 24 strokes of cane & 24 years of impriosnment.If there
is a person raped his daughter 5 times,how many stokes of canes our
judges think is needed?