hmm...if you were a real Thai, your history lesson failed, your
memory is short, your facts are completely twisted and your
understanding of current event is totally illogical.
First of all, it was on 23 Feb 1991 when the army under Suchinda
Kraprayoon ousted the government under Choonhavan, elected as prime
minister since 1988. An interim government under Arnand was
appointed but in 1992, Suchinda became the prime minister and
wanted an amendment to the clause in constitution for him to remain
as prime minister until the parliament was dissolved. That sparked
massive protest under Chamlong, and later the infamous Bloody May
in Thai history, when the military fired at students and
demonstrators resulting in don't know how many deaths. Thousands
were arrested, tortured and left to die. But finally with the
intervention of the King, Suchinda resigned but the military
constitutions continued until 1997.
Tell me, in 1992, Suchinda was the prime minister, who was the coup
leader? Chamlong? 
Who are the blood suckers???
In 2006, the Thai military has done it again as they did in 1991,
they ousted a demoncratically elected government and a military
commander took over as prime minister. Then what? Can the Thai
people now make any changes through demoncratic process or would
they need to go on the street to oust the military? be careful, the
military is still using M16.
The transition from military to civilian rule in Thailand since
1973 has been difficult and sometimes bloody with several reversals
along the way. Is this yet another reversals? It seems that
demonizing the previous government would be a good and innovative
means to divert the attention of the people from the ugly
past.
Don't pull in Singapore unless you have the evidence!!
