Aleister Crowley's legacy goes beyond providing the likes of
Somerset Maughm and Dennis Wheatley models for villains in novels;
beyond scowling from the cover of the Beatles's SGT. PEPPER's
album; beyond providing Led Zeppelin¹s Jimmy Page a collector's
hobby and pastime; and beyond giving Ozzy Osbourne something to
sing about. His influence surrounds us. In advertising, film,
music, literature, art -- his paintings anticipated the very best
of the Expressionist and Brutarian schools with bold splashes of
vibrant color and unsettling forms and portraits -- Crowley's
imagery and referents touch us many times each day. He remains a
pivotal, compelling presence; he might have fared better had we
tried to understand him primarily as an artistic type, rather than
as an occultist, but that choice was largely his to make, and
choose he did. Popular culture would be much different had Aleister
Crowley not offered his imprint.
Incidentally, Stanley Kubrick¹s final film, EYES WIDE SHUT, may
well have been intended as a revelation of sex magic still being
practiced today, but the released version is a hodge-podge of
unfinished scenes, bad rehearsals, and pointless if beautiful
images. Those numbed by it lacked context to sort out those hints,
winks, and nudges, but the signals were there for those with the
code and it's a shame Kubrick died before making his final cut. And
he died, please note, as mysteriously and conveniently, for some,
as the prostitute in the movie.
Despite all this, however, the final word of the movie emphasizes a
message Crowley would have recognized and applauded, even as it
left most audiences bored, puzzled, and taken aback. And no, the
word was not "Love," as the Beatles might have claimed. The word
was an imperious command and a desperate plea: "Fuck." It may be
our best, even our only, chance at redemption, is the message. All
we need is love? Not quite.
Crowley snarled at mere love and insisted upon will, even as he
trumped Nietzsche's atheism with a new theism focused on each of
us. He meant that cognizance, being aware and willing things, is
more important than a bland, mushy, all-encompassing hippie-dippie
haze of lovey-dovey feelings. It allows each of us to aspire to
godhood. Thelema comes from the Greek for "will", and his
principles have informed discussions of a wide range of occult and
religious endeavor, from Gnosticism and Sephiroth and Qabbalah
studies to Rosicrucianism and even unto Anton Szandor LaVey¹s
Church of Satan, silly as that bit of hedonism would have seemed to
Crowley.
And yet, it was Crowley's willingness to play to the hilt the role
of AntiChrist that early on saw him branded The Wickedest Man on
Earth and so on. That he was bisexual in an age even less tolerant
than our own did nothing to help Crowley's acceptance; he was alive
during Oscar Wilde¹s public flogging over a homosexual affair,
remember. Tolerance was not anyone¹s watchword.
Crowley was excoriated and pilloried by tabloids in England and in
newspapers and magazines the world over in a campaign of bile
unequaled even by the right-wing spew against Bill Clinton. It cost
him his reputation as a gentleman, it cost him safe haven in many
countries, and it ended up costing him even a chance at making a
modest living as a writer. By the time the attacks had reached
their heights of stridency and hysteria, Crowley lacked funds to
bring lawsuits for libel and slander, and so he remained stoic,
even devilishly insouciant, and modified his own behavior not a
whit.
This too cost him, as few could afford the public castigation any
link with him would bring. He ended up destitute much of his life,
once he¹d gone through the modest fortune he'd inherited, and he
lived off sponging, frequent moves to duck dunning landlords, and
the occasional sale of a bit of writing or his services as a
teacher of magic tradition. His few followers contributed what they
could, but it was very little.
Lawrence Sutin has now given us two biographies of men who claimed
contact with higher intelligences. (Can L. Ron Hubbard be far
behind in this string of investigations?) Visionaries, loons, or
simply sad examples of genius gone awry -- one's reaction to the
subjects of his biographies is left to each reader, but it's
compelling, important work on neglected, misconstrued, remarkable
people that Sutin offers.
If there is any lack in Do What Thou Wilt it lies in the slender
photograph section. As one reads, one craves glimpses of Crowley's
many Scarlet Women, for instance, or the sight of his Abbey,
decorated with original paintings and murals.