Originally posted by saffron60:
Originally posted by Atobe:
''What theories were being discussed ?''
You were talking about the companies, so you are saying that the
statements you made are not theories, so what are they?
facts?
Still not satisfied, and wanting
to salvage loss saffron
pride ?
Are we talking about Per Capita that concerns countries or nations
?
Did we talk about companies ?
Are you in the right thread, or in the right track of mind ?
Hang loose a wee bit, and you may get your mind back again, and
probably find your lost saffron pride too.
''Can you manage to
understand any discussion of such economic theories or concepts,
when you had initially stated - I'm not an expert on economics
either, so i can't simply draw theories and conclusions between
foreign exchange reserves and gov spending. ?''
Yes, at least i can admit that i'm not an expert, but
you...hahahaha...made stupid blunders as well and you are toooooo
proud to admit it.
Sadly, only a clown will laugh at
his own mistakes, and attempt to make it appear as expert antics
.... and will hahahaha over his own foolishness.
How long did you grind your teeeth before you were able to hahahaha
about this ?
''First, you made a
useless attempt to ridicule my use of the words NATIONAL RESERVES -
now you are attempting to question my use of the words HIGH PER
CAPITA INCOME - are you capable ?''
It seems that once you latch to other people's mistake, you can't
seem to let it go and you use it to discredit me when i'm trying to
point out your mistake. This stupid tactic will not work. Like i
said, you wasted 2 long posts talking about it and you still can't
let it go. Your mistake about per capita income has got nothing to
do with this, but you are using my mistake to avoid talking about
yours. Oh grow up!
What mistake did you achieve to
point out ?
Was it not a fact that you have made the excuse that you are not an
"economic expert" but yet will make all kinds of baseless
statements and wild interpretations that simply exposed your
stupidity.
If you persist in being supremely stubborn in your stupidity, to
continue your baseless assault on my writing, do I not have the
right to reply to your stupidity and provocation ?
Your continued insistence to shore up loss saffron pride will soon make you turn
from pungently acrid saffron color, to pale yellow that is
decomposingly putrid.
''Can you even understand
that 'Per Capita is also understood as 'PER CAPITA INCOME' - unless
you can prove me wrong in anyway ?''
Hahahaha..this shows what a moron you are...how can you say that
per capita can also be understood as per capita income?
You made a grossly wrong assumption on
the use of the term 'per capita'. anybody who studied at
least some basic economics will know that it's not the same thing.
Hehe..you really a blur creature, picking out quotes that have
economic terms and you don't really understand them. go do your own
homework on this, if i am wrong, you prove it., otherwise i will
maintain that you are a stubborn creature who refuses to accept his
mistake.
Try harder at laughing instead of
some feeble Hahahahha and Hehe - as it still cannot hide the fact
that you begin to sound more silly than what others can possibly
make you out to be.
Not too clever with your views to shore up your wounded
saffron pride, when you
have been exposed to be nothing better than a loud mouth fraud,
with nothing to substantiate your positions taken against
others.
Did anyone come to your side of the views to what I have posted
?
I am opening myself to be corrected by anyone who believe that what
I have posted is in error - and perhaps draw some real lessons in
economic terms; but surely you cannot be the person, as you have
already stated that you are not an economic
expert.
''Was there any mistake in
my statement - ''empty boast of HIGH Per Capita income based on
National Reserves is NOTHING more then DELUDING ourselves" ? This
statement was made in response to lionnoisy's post that boasted of
Singapore's 'PER CAPITA is amongst the Top 10 Reserves in foreign
exchange and gold'.
Are you such a pathetic nut to be only capable of nit-picking ANY
AVOID debating on the real issues ?''
Yes, there was a mistake because you can't seem to understand that
per capita is not the same as per capita income and you keep
defending your statement. If you can't understand basic economic
terms, it is useless to analyze people's posts based on your very
poor understanding.
Is it odd that you keep returning
to this 'Per Capita' and 'Per Capita Income' issue - and will even
refuse to accept the previous referenced site given in my last
reply.
Is there a need for you to be so concerned with these two terms,
when you cannot even accept the given explanation in the usage of
these two terms ?
per cap·i·ta (pər kãp'ĭ-tə )
adv. & adj.
Per unit of population; per person: In that year, Americans earned
$15,304 per capita. Among the states, Connecticut has a high per
capita income.
Equally to each individual.
The noun per capita income has one meaning:
Meaning #1: the total national income divided by the number of
people in the nation
The above is not something that I
have made up, and you would probably have saved your saffron pride a few days ago if you
had taken the trouble to accept my advise to you - "to research
your position first before jumping into something that you are not
prepared for" .
Somehow, you will not accept good advise, thinking yourself to be
cleverer than all those around you.
Too bad that so much tattered pride need to be salvaged, and the
remaining shreds will soon be torn off - if you persist in your
stupidity.
