Originally posted by oxford mushroom:
Your usual lengthy posts have little substance and reminds me of
the Chinese saying: "Wang da nian de luo jiao bu, yiu chou yiu
chang"
Is that the best that you can
offer from your understanding of what has been printed - a simple
childish retort of the post being "yiu chou yiu chang".
Is it any wonder that you are the butt of everyone's joke, seeing
where you have sunk your nose in to appreciate only the
"yiu chou yiu
chang".
It simply shows the depth of your intellect - which so far has
produced nothing of any substance in all of your postings, allowing
anyone without even a PhD qualification to debunk your postion so
easily; and you even dare to boast so publicly of your
qualification in this Forum.
You do not have the guts of David Marshall to admit that the
current government has done better that he could ever do with his
puny efforts. Yet you dare to make such bold statements unsupported
by any shred of evidence.
Can you handle evidence ? You have
consistently slinked away from further postings after evidence have
been produced.
In your last post on
6 February 2007 06.32PM - you had also asked "First, where's your evidence that the
majority of Singaporeans are employed by state-owned
companies?" - my response showed that more 40 per cent of
the capitalization on the Singapore Stock Exchange belonged to
State Owned Companies - did you have the guts or the simple honesty
to react to my reply that met your challenge for evidence ?
It seems that you had lost your voice for three days having been
publicly debunked, and now have the audacity to write to me about
not having guts to admit on facts.
David Marshall has never been as ruthless as LKY, and history has
placed that on record - as even remarked in LKY's memoirs. David
Marshall is obviously more of a gracious gentleman than LKY can
possibly be - as seen from all public events on record.
Unfortunately, in his old age, David Marshall remained as naive and
simplistic as he was in his younger days. Can David Marshall be as
ruthless and an unforgiving critic as LKY has always been ?
Compared to David Marshall in his twilight years, LKY remains as
sharp and ruthless as LKY had always been - never suffer any fools
in his presence. While David Marshall had always been mild
mannered, patient, and more generous towards those who are less
fortunate than himself.
What about yourself, can any of your boastful PhD qualities and
personal traits measure anywhere up to David Marshall's ankle
?
Instead of asking evidence from me to support my statements, why do
you not produce any evidence to the contrary and debunk my
position. Why do you slink quietly away when you have been so
clearly exposed of your low intellect ?
Just because the majority of Singaporeans choose to support the
ruling party election after election does not mean they are
brainwashed. It means we are not easily swayed by your vitriolic
attacks on the government.
The majority of Singaporeans
choose to support the ruling party election after election ?
Only a uncritical simpleton will accept the results of the
elections on its face value.
According to the Singapore
Statistics Department 2006 Report - the Total Population of
Singapore by June 2006 was 4.48 Million; with those in the age
group between 15 to 64 numbering 2,603,900 and those above 65 years
being 306,500.
According to the 2006 Election
Results: the number of eligible voters were 2,158,704 - which
compared to the age group of 15 - 65+ is about 74 percent.
The total voters that voted was 1,222,884 - which represent 56.6
per cent of all the eligible voters; and the voter turnout was
1,150,003 (which is 94.0% of the total voter count of
1,222,884.
The number of voters in walkover constituencies was 935,820 - which
represent 43.4 per cent of the total eligible voters of 2,158,704
not being able to cast their votes.
Comparing to the total population of 4,480,000 - the total of
1,150,003 votes counted will represent only 25.66 per cent of the
population.
Is it not even more shocking that of the 1,150,003 votes counted,
the Ruling Party only managed to get 66.6 per cent of all the valid
votes - a mere 765,901 out of a population of 4,480,000.
Did the majority of Singaporeans voted for the Ruling Party ?
Can you digest the evidence produced, or do you prefer to be blind
sided by the slick self-serving propaganda that protect the
interests of the Ruling Party ?
