FEER has fired the departing bloody shots.i find them
provocative and want
blood shed here..
They jus want racial riots happen again,serious.
FEER simply just want scholarships and jobs etc distributed
by
races ratio.If cannot be done ,then the races under distributed,by
the writers opinions,are not so smart.What a damn WRONG agrument!
&$%...
The
Charade Of Meritocracy,October 2006,By Michael D. Barr
,FEER.
Mr. Barr is a lecturer at the University of Queensland and author
of Lee Kuan Yew: The Beliefs Behind the Man (Routledge, 2000) and
Cultural Politics and Asian Values: The Tepid War (Routledge,
2002).
Thanks to CSJ
link
more ammo are here to shoot
this little red dot
Below are the examples of provactive sentences.
But this system conceals several unacknowledged
agendas.....
Of the top 30 GLCs only two (6.7%) were chaired by non-Chinese in
1991 (and neither of the non-Chinese was a Malay).....
According to the logic of meritocracy, that means the Chinese have
been getting smarter, at least compared to the
non-Chinese.....
This makes the selection process much more subjective than one
would expect in a system that claims to be a meritocracy, and it
creates ample opportunity for racial and other prejudices to
operate with relative freedom....
The advertorial articles accompanying the paid advertisements
featured only one non-Chinese scholar (a Malay on a lowly local
scholarship) amongst 28 Chinese on prestigious overseas
scholarships....

A Chinese woman has a much better chance of winning an SAF
scholarship than a Malay man.....
By contrast, neither Indians nor Malays received any special help,
let alone schools of their own to address their special needs. They
were not only left to fend for themselves, but were sometimes
subjected to wanton neglect: inadequately trained teachers,
substandard facilities and resources and the knowledge that they
are not as good as the Chinese.
2.FEER is very generious.Free essay to thumb down SG.
Financial
Center Pipedreams,October 2006,By Hugo Restall
,Editor,FEER
Hinted by CSJ site.
As it happens,
Singapore's Newspapers and Printing Presses Act does not
cover the online version of the Review at
www.feer.com, where, the Review tells us, it will do its best to
make its October issue available free of charge to Singaporeans. In
addition -- and free to all readers -- the Review is posting the
disputed article, the Lees' court pleadings and its correspondence
with the Lees' attorneys and the Ministry of Information.