Originally posted by Slivester:
I believe theres an Asian military feasibility study in 1999 or
1998, in which concludes that SAF can overcome a MAF's invasion,
and completely annihilate the MAF within 1 month [b]if they used up all resources to
invade Singapore. With the MAF in ruins, SAF can then take
Malaysia.
However, if SAF leads the invasion to Malaysia and MAF used all
resources to resist the invasion, Singapore will take nearly 1.5
month to take the entire Peninsular, and if MAF gets reinforced in
West Malaysia, they may counter-attack into Singapore.
In entirely, the study states that unless SAF have support from
armed military assistance, its highly unprobable that SAF can win
both Peninsular and West when SAF leads the invasion. In fact, if
SAF ever wanted to attack, it would probably stop when she reaches
Johor, recruit, reinforce, then defend.
MAF takes the stand of defence. Definitely if she attacks
Singapore, US will step in. The amount of western investment here
is enough to justify an attack.
-------------
Take the scenario when MAF invades. SAF completely defended SG and
paramount losses for MAF. SAF reinforce with aid from US, launches
a campaign against Malaysia. SAF takes MY.
Next will be the reparation work. Which will most definitely
bankrupt the economy of both state. I don't think the rulling
government will even agree in theory to invade MY. Sort of an
economic disaster, and will most definitely set SG back to the
1970s or even earlier, in terms of economic power and investor's
confidence.[/b]
east and west malaysia is hundreds of kilometers apart..... do
you expect their soldiers to swim across open sea?
and even if they leave east malaysia completely undefended
(practically inviting indonesia occupation) and move every MAF
soldier to johor(talk cock).. we still outnumber them 3 to 1.
