Well, its one cross after another. But really, I don't
understand this issue of letting the NGOs protest in the open. You
fence up the area with razor-tipped fences, you just let them
protest in the sun lahz. You provide aircon, they complain you
welfare, then tekan them lor, let them bake in the sun lahz. If you
wanna be nice, show you got compassion, mebbe put two water tanks
there lahz. Now outside got no shelter mahz...so its defined as in
the open right? Then in the open they protest, at most you get the
SOC chaps to surround them in riot kit lahz, they guai lan, just
whack. The IMF and WB chief cannot say anything what right? If not,
you let them protest in the open, but make sure the go inside an
area surrounded by the razor-fence lor, if anything, they wana run
also cannot run, then you can ask SOC or Grukha to chiong in and
have a field day hammering them or live target practice mahz.
Stupid siahz...scholar go top University never teach them this meh?
Rules are meant not to be broken, but bent.
If paranoid that the 27 chaps might pull off some stunt,
ok...create a tent city for them also IN THE OPEN but tell them
they must scan their passport when they go out or something lahz,
then IMF and WB chief also LAN LAN, cannot say anything what,cuz
you can say in view of the current security situation we are
putting the interest of our guests as top priority what right. They
want protest, you let them protest already right? They want NGO ppl
to come in, you let them to come in already right? They want to
protest outside, since people don't understand your welfare, then
you let them lor, protest outside lah. The agreement never say must
protet under what conditions right? So there you have it.
Sometimes, I feel that we the poor and common people actually
possess more cow sense and look into the finer details of things as
compared to scholars. Damn, I'm beginning to feel that we are all
more clever then the scholars in our creativity problem solving
abilities man. 
