Citiznes have been listening to a lot of Minister Mah's craps
and assumptions about HDB subsidies when the facts are heavily
disguised by creative accounting about the way HDB acquires the
land using public fund and then hands it over to state land for
windfall unrecorded profits and then make the HDB pay the land cost
before showing the subsidy.
Is this kind of minister's computation of HDB flat price acceptable
or reflecting proper conduct of minister?
We are now told that minister Mah has the vision that come 2009,
there would be shortage of hotel rooms. How to believe him now when
he has used creative accounting to compute HDB subsidy.
Is Minister Mah merely auto-piloting his tax-and-recover past
policy practised on HDB or is his new assumptions now
factual.
Citizens have suffered high costs of living and loss of our
economic competitiveness, due to such auto-piloting of many past
policies adopted by ministers to avoid incurring deficits or to
increase surpluses. Should such ministers not go and get some
re-training instead of citizens.
There should be some neutral private institute to monitor
government ministers' policies and performances to get the economy
running again e.g.
Whether LTA has improved its safety standards in 2006 (after Nicol
Highway collapse or overhead-bridge barricade accidents) ?
VOTE: Reply: PGPI-1 - (1, 2 or 3)
(representing: 1-parameters not attained; 2=satisfactory ; 3=well
done)
(PGPI-2) Whether MOM has served Singaporean workers with higher
priority than foreign workers : Vote: (1/2/3)
(PGPI-3) Whether NTUC has served employees with higher priority
over employers: Vote: (1/2/3)
(PGPI-4) Whether Ministers have become more proactive in creating
employment opportunities for citizens or whether they are trying to
avoid the problem by urging the unemployed "not to be choosy", "go
for retraining" or harping on constant "no free lunch" excuses:
Vote: (1/2/3)