Originally posted by Atobe:
......
Over the years, there has been continuous negative opinions by the
[b]International Commission of Jurists towards the Singapore
Judiciary - which has passed consistently negative conclusions on
political issues.
This reason alone, will makes it even more important for MM LKY to
accept political lawsuits to be settled in a neutral venue located
in a First World Country, with a panel of Judges from the First
World, and comparing Singapore Legislations with that of several
First World Countries as references. [/color]
[/b]
I still believe the independent of Singapore Judiciary.
Remember that the judges are only allowed to look at what is
presented in black and white on the case in hand and be guided by
the Blank and White of the Law.
If you loss the case, it is not because you are right or wrong, but
how your case has been presented, by your lawyer, both in writing
and deliberated in the court.
What is not presented, the truth, whether it is in your head or
other places (for example the fact that Durian do travel in first
class using NKF fund), the judge cannot take into consideration, if
they are not presented in writing or deliberated in the
court.
The failure if any, is because we are not rich enough, to engage
the top lawyer, who understand the Laws, to look at all angle, and
to get all the relevant supporting facts, and to argue the case
properly, to the judge.
