How to balance between the rich and poor

latterrain SG

Any views?

king108 SG

Laughing Rob the rich legally and make them say thank to you.

take some 5% for yourself for robbing them.

Pass 85% to the poor and they will thank you automatically.

The 10% for medical and insurance expenses.

Captain ^-^ SG

rich and poor is aready different in spelling how to balance?
there will be a day that come when you are so rich that you realise that you need to contribute back to the sociality,you need to invest back so the market will move,the people will got work and every things will be moving.

but of course you could keep your fortune,but that wont make you any better,just your life better,what we need is just a heart to live.
is always good that we could contribute back to the nation and the world when they become better we become better,that"s life Very Happy

king108 SG

Laughing you can be rich and don't contribute...but make sure the poor don't wake up suddenly one day..

LinYu SG

practice "four legs good and two legs bad"
Laughing

Ito_^ SG

none.

its the sense of social responsibility and kindness that we need to foster.

dream on.

robertteh SG

Democracy is a good name. So it will be good to use democracy or accountability principles for good presentation and reputation as it the good to justify any mistakes or wrongs by such name.

Whether one should practise democracy to motivate people in participating in practical knowledge application, or creativity, entrepreneurship, social or economic vibrancy through mass participation, that is another matter.

Never mind about trade-off in creativity and entrepreneurship for the time being, as democracy is too idealistic and freedom can be abused and lead to chaos.

See what happens in chaosland. So it is better to talk democracy for good name but it is no good to practise it.

One does not really have to worry as the end will justify the means.

Robinhood is a good name so Robinhood wannabies will find it such a wonderful name to justify robbing with intention to keep plenty for themselves.

Scholars and meritocracy are good names and so they can be used for control purposes as the victor is always the king.

Who are the true scholars and who are the scholars who turned yesmen for their own self-preservation is not too great a concern. That is called pragmatism which can be debated another day.

For good order sake it is better not to admit problems with meritocracy or scholars as they are good to use to keeping running and controlling for good order sake. True or not is the talent does not figure in this world a most realistic world.

Economy or competitiveness is good talking point and whether there is or is not economy or competitiveness is another matter. Who can prove there is no economy anyway as world will soon recover after all the recessions...

king108 SG

Laughing I will see a lot of "monkeys" on the road tommorrow practising four legs.. Use 4 eyes good and two eyes no good..

NewAge SG

U go play robinhood loh

Agenda SG

Communism Mr. Green

king108 SG

Laughing Friends that one where got rich and poor...

That one got powerful rich and weak poor..

LinYu SG

Its Commusium at its ideal stage Laughing

fedor86 SG

all I can think off is to make education affordable by all.

Ito_^ SG

anyways to reach dat ideal stage, we cannot force it to happen. it wld probably juz naturally progress..