Originally posted by BillyBong:
It's narrow-minded to think everything that Khoo is doing is merely
for the pursuit of self-glory alone.
he is portraying himself to be a doer of good for singapore. i'm
merely flipping the coin around to show what he is really up to,
which is nothing more than self glory.
Just as honest folks earn a decent living through profitable work,
so does Khoo earn his living by giving motivational talks, writing
books etc. A man's gotta earn a living. Just because you disapprove
of his line of work does not mean he's scum. The money he earns is
legitimate and also through hard work. The way you preach sounds
like you're the only honest-living person in
SG.
a couple of hours of "motivational" or should i say self glorifying
talk earns big bucks for him. that's hard work? using public funds
to pursue his hobbies is an honest way of making a living? i may
not be the only honest living person in the world, but i don't use
public funds to perform clown acts in public.
And only a fool would self-finance himself for ardous trips to the
south pole or to climb seven of the highest peaks. Unless you're a
Donald Trump or Bill Gates, its not even feasible to consider such
expensive enterprises. The fact that he actively seeks the
necessary sponsorship for his endeavours indicates a form of
entrepreneurship mind that few of us exhibit. Isn't that what our
beloved gahmen is attempting to develop?
arduous to some extent perhaps but not extraordinarily so. south
pole and highest peaks maybe. but cooped-in-a-tank gimmick? that
deserves sponsorship? that's entrepreneurial endeavour? more like
waste of public funds isn't it? you mean garmen is agweeable to
sponsoring any kind of silly act?
And it seems that you're conveniently overlooked the difficulties
and life-threatening situations each of his task requires. As he
already mentioned, there is no 'medal or cash incentive' for each
of his journeys, evidently a snipe at SSC's cash incentive scheme
for sportsmen. He is clearly differentiating himself from the
average sportmen that SG has developed.
what life threatening situation is there in the cooped-in-a-tank
gimmick? any time he wants to he can surface right? it's not as if
he is tied up and performing some houdini trick.
sports is something you can identify with, something you approve
because it involves graceful skill or extraordinary human
abilities. we all can run, but we can't run as fast as shyam so we
respect him for that. we play badminton, but we're not as skillful
or graceful as susilo so we applaud his achievements.
cooped-in-a-tank act? who gives a damn? just about anybody can
coop-in-a-tank, with oxygen, liquid food, sanitation provided, the
whole gimmick is designed for any average joe to last in that tank.
what testament to human spirit or ability is there?
If that isn't enough, he has proven that certain dreams don't
require a a huge cash flow to realise, but merely requires the
right approach through appropriate channels. Campaigning for
sponsorship is a win-win situation for both the campaigner and the
provider. After all, you think Lance Armstrong or Amelia Earheart
held decent jobs?
that cooped-in-tank gimmick isn't exactly cheap and it uses public
funds. win-win? he won, the public lost. he got his fame (which
would lead to fortune), what did the public get in return? Lance
Armstrong is a testament to human spirit and triumph. i don't know
what that cooped-in-a-tank act signifies. Amelia earhart had to
work hard to save for her adventures. our friend? open mouth only
money pour in like rain. so easy, hardly the true pursuer of dreams
and passion that amelia is.
And as to your cynical remark: so it's all about money isn't it?,
my question to you is quite simply: What
isn't?
cynical to you perhaps, but nevertheless appropriate. he sounded as
if he's doing some wondrous good for singapore when in fact he is
merely doing it for his own glory while hypocritically claiming to
be contributing to the country. what good has he done for the
country submerging himself in a tank? so to answer your question,
why claim to be doing something noble when in fact you're actually
doing it for your own selfish reasons? and if it is selfish
endeavour why use public funds?