Homosexuality is Against Nature

last SG · 2005-09-08T18:38:18+00:00

PRP I have already warned you. If you stoop down to personal attacks I will close your threads. Dear all, this thread is closed. PRP any restarting of this...

thinger SG

now you mention it,
yeah. i read that too.

dolphins are the only other animal (i think?? but how about apes + pigs) that do it recreationally.

vito_corleone SG

and you're not sticking to the topic. Laughing since you say its absolutely wrong to say whether something is subjective or not, then you are contradicting your own statement that homosexuality is against nature because that is your own viewpoint. Rolling Eyes

vito_corleone SG

Originally posted by PRP:
[b]What is the purpose of sex?

Under the rule of nature,the purpose of sex is procreation. Homo sex can't achieve that natural purpose.So it is contrary to nature.This is an objective fact.

But of course,whether contrary to nature is wrong?That can be debated.[/b]

reproduction has nothing to do with sexual pleasure or prefrence. Laughing

SilverPal SG

I guess homo sex serves the purpose of pleasure?

I dun mind gays and les, as long as they dun bother me about it.

thinger SG

ha i think they’re cool

JennTS SG

im not to sure but, i think homosexuals are born gay and it would be natural for them in that case to like members of their own sex.

shade343 SG

Actually, they are not. Its just that they find people of their same sex more attractive. They can also become heterosexual if they feel like it. Its really a matter of choice.

SilverPal SG

I think that's still under research right? Nothing concrete yet.

thinger SG

yep

still being reserached.

JennTS SG

well im not homosexual so i wont argue about it.

but i am transsexual, and im a hetrosexual guy as well as a hetrosexual gal, yet im not gay. wierd.

thinger SG

cool.

er, really?

JennTS SG

well i like guys as a woman would, but not in the gay sense.

thinger SG

okay...

i wouldnt know...but yeh.

[email protected] SG

Let me ask u again PRP. Do u actually read anything I post? Or do U choose to ignore it?

U've already ignored THIS post once.

PRP SG

Heng said I didn't uphold to my principles of "fairness,righteousness & kindness".

Since i believe homo is wrong,it is righteous of me to say so.

When i see wrong opinion on this topic,i'm kind enuf to rebut it.Mind u, i've not duty do do so & i can keep my opinions to myself.I'm also kind enuf to offer my opinion on the right attitude towards sex.

All along, my stand is always not to discriminate against homo despite their wrong sexual behavior.So I'm fair.

PRP SG

I think Earthlings is a gentlman who wanted to close his topic & would not talk about this topic in this forum.

PRP SG

Yes,some so called gays are actually bisexuals.Maybe they can't have heterosex,so they have homosex.

bluewinged SG

in my opinion, homosexuality is against nature but not against human rights,after all they have the right to choose their future.

Atobe SG

Originally posted by PRP:
I think Earthlings is a gentlman who wanted to close his topic & would not talk about this topic in this forum.

Did he close the topic as he would not talk about this topic in this forum, or did he find his position untenable in the manner that his position is being confronted - point by point ?

You were right in what you had stated when you opened this thread, earthling73 took a parting shot at my last response to his postings and decided to close the thread by not giving me a right to reply to his selective misquote from my response.

Is eathlings73 a 'gentleman' or a 'gentle man', or even a 'Man' at all ?

oxford mushroom SG

Whatever...it is clear that he is man of one issue and one issue alone...to defend and disseminate gay rights. I think the aggressive campaign launched by the gay community for greater acceptance has only served to alienate more of the moderate conservatives in society.

« Previous Page Next Page »