Reply posted by earthlings73:
Quote from post by pikamaster:
You know sth ppl,
I find this discussion getting more and more crappy!! Both sides in
this argument are extremely biased, and none of the evidence
provided provides a satisfactory justification for either
side...
the (snapped) pikamaster
Ah.. Crappy response for crappy accusations.. 
To be honest, just tired of spending 4-5 hours
reading and responding to accusations.. With the other party
twisting words ard just to show that he's right..
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply posted by earthlings73:
Quote from post by Atobe:
The Health Risks
of Gay Sex
JOHN R. DIGGS, JR.
M.D.
Don't be fooled by the professional title.. These articles are still backed by religion, just go
see the website..
Ah.. To make this post less crappy.. Do you guys know what's the
big killer for most of these so-called "gays engaged in more risky
sexual behaviours?" studies? The sampling issue.. Gays and
straights cannot be differentiated on the surface appearance..
Hence, how do the studies get their sample from? Most likely from
gay bars, saunas, etc..
There's such a sub-culture within the gay comm (and a rather
vibrant one but not unique to gays though) but it does not mean
that these people represent all gays in the population.. If you are
going to find someone who's more risky in sex to begin with, you
will of course come up with the conclusion that gays practice more
risky sex..
In short, there are many gays who do not patronise gay bars, saunas
etc.. Are they included in such studies? No! See the bias in these
studies already?
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Crappy response ? "
"With the other party twisting words ard
just to show that he's right ? "
From the two replies posted by some earthlings, the crappy response
given has certainly punctured the air out of any more attempts by
Homosexuals who claim to be earthlings ?
Is this the best an earthling can do - deriding the efforts of this
Dr JOHN R. DIGGS, JR. M.D on a mere sampling issue - based on
contorted Homosexual readings of this posted article ?
"Gays and straights cannot be
differentiated on the surface appearance.. Hence, how do the
studies get their sample from? Most likely from gay bars, saunas,
etc.. "
How does one come to this conclusionwhen reading from the article
that was posted :
The
Health Risks of Gay Sex
JOHN R. DIGGS, JR. M.D.
How were the words printed by Dr John R. Diggs, Jr become so
cleverly twisted to a discrediting conclusion that his surveys are
from
" gay bars, saunas, etc... " ?
When an article posted by Dr Paul Cameron was offered, some
earthling shot it with a derisive attempt by the bias APA towards
this eminent doctor, who simply did not agree with the bias
position taken by the APA.
Should we not be surprised that Dr John R. Diggs had also written
an article that is quite similar to that of Dr Paul Cameron ?
Two eminent doctors both having the same views, how many more are
there that have not posted their views on the WWW ?
Does a religious site carrying the work of a Professional discredit
the medical views of that Professional ?
This is not the usual desparate crap from normal earthlings.... but
HOMOSEXUALS disguised as earthlings in the aggressive defense of
HOMOSEXUALS.
"To be honest, just tired of spending
4-5 hours reading and responding to accusations.. " and
still making further useless and ardous attempts to defend the
unattainable goals for HOMOSEXUALS in Singapore ?
