Discrimination has social-political implications. This thread
was not set-up to talk exclusively about sex.
Didnt you suggest earlier that gays should seek psychological
help?
If this is the case, you would agree on the position that you
can't change sexuality from one end to the other.
I didn't deny that Christianity and Islam were against
homosexuality. But in Hinduism and Buddhism, there are no specific
scripts quoting directly that homosexuality is a sin. I had even
shown that Dalai Lama had shown his understanding of the gay
issues.
You mean implying that I have nothing to do except sex, that you
have all the rights to discriminate against me, that I have to live
on my parents support are not insults?
You dont see it as a discrimination because you failed to see that
not all homosexuals are in single status. Which in itself, a
discrimination.
Then the argument should be homosexuality is sinful. But then,
please go to EH.
A society is made up of people with different Religion (or
without), should a 3rd party be pulled in to examine the issue.
Psychologists are still one of the biggest profession that handles
this issue. And it's important to examine whether your claims of
abnormality have any basis, which in this case, you failed to show
any basis.
You do not need every single individuals within the species to
procreate for the species to survive. Homosexuals can be found
since history was recorded. Shouldn't the human race by wiped out
already? Judging from your argument. But no.. we have an
exponential rise in birth rates over the last century.
But you did write "why are gays so sensitive? because gays are
1/2 male"? Didn't you write that? And now you are claiming that
this is not your position because of an article you had
quote?
