1) Increase in HIV infection in Singapore amongst Gays -
19-9-2004
http://www.singapore-window.org/sw04/040919a1.htm
Singapore facing alarming AIDS epidemic : Government
11-11-2004
http://www.singapore-window.org/sw04/041111af.htm
Your initial claim was that "All gays have AIDS"... These
articles you had quoted did not address this issue.
If you look at the MOH report, you will realise that the biggest
spike comes from the bisexual group... This is most likely those
who are married, but didn't managed to control their sexual
urges... And do not that it's still a small percentage compared to
the heterosexual...
2) Is this effort of yours in highlighting 'GAY ISSUES' simply
an attempt to familiarise PUBLIC AWARENESS, or with the LARGER GOAL
of pushing PUBLIC OPINION to the ULTIMATE GOAL of Singaporean
ACCEPTANCE to SAME SEX MARRIAGE ?
How can HOMOSEXUALS be discriminated if they 'REMAIN SINGLE'
?
There are ALTERNATIVES to PUBLIC HOUSING - and if you claimed that
HOMOSEXUALS are also great achievers and contributors to the
Singapore economy, surely they can afford PRIVATE HOUSING and not
be dependant on PUBLIC HOUSING.
Isn't this a circular argument? The very fact is that there are
gays who practiced monogamy, but we couldn't buy public
housing.
I was arguing that married couples with kids are given $20,000 tax
rebates.. Many of them do not have to contribute a single cent to
the income tax for a few years... You are the one who extended this
argument to become "All gays are rich"... As mentioned earlier,
private housings are 2-3 times more expensive than public
housings... And less than 20% of the housing type belongs to this
group... Which means, unless than combined income of the 2 persons
involved make it to the top 20% of the population, it's not easy to
get private housings...
3) MARRIAGE AGAIN ?
Are you suggesting that SINGLE SINGAPOREANS cannot bequeath their
assets to anyone of their own choosing ?
Firstly, you had claimed that you cannot afford the legal costs to
prepare a will, then you claim that the Will of any Single is NOT
recognised, and ......
If everyone can afford to pay the legal fee, why not extend this
policy to everyone, including of the heterosexual couples? Singles,
by default, pass their assets to their families (sisters, brothers,
etc)... For gays, the inheritance process is different, we cannot
pass to an unrelated person (in blood) unless we specifically state
it down in a will...
Do you see the double standards oredi?
Wasn't your last attempt at HOMOSEXUAL PUBLICITY shut down ?
If my information is baseless, are your information seen to be of
any foundation, when your interpretation were slanted and selected
out-of-context to suit your unique bent positions ?
Your dependance on APA is questionable as their professional
opinions are not entirely recognised by professionals from other
countries, let alone from the Singapore Medical Council or by the
Ministry of Health.
It was shut because the discussion gone into theology without
addressing the gay issues..
How was it out of context? At least all my citations are consistent
with each other...And I dont have to rely on Glossy News (or
talkingcock.com) to put forth my position. There no point putting
forth an entire article without knowing what's the article
abt..
If the issue is a psychological related one, why can't i use the
public info from the world largest psych association? many of local
psychologists receive their education in either america or
britain.. And mind you, BPS and China mental heath association have
the same conclusions..
