Originally posted by ndsef:
I don't know whether anyone noticed it. Cmparing the
speeches of LHL, GCT and LKY, you can see the difference in the
usage of words. LHL uses a lot of "street slang" like "flunking"
and "Hanging out". This is to communicate with the younger
Singaporeans.
One part of his speech that left a deep impression on me is when he
mentioned about the few Singaporeans who are in East Timor. These
Singaporeans knowing that Dr. Tony Tan is coming to town, went to
the airport to meet him. They had a discussion and they did not ask
the Govt to assist them in any way except to leave the SAF on UN
Mission there longer. I repeat, "[b]They did not ask for the govt
to assist them
Doesn't this mean something to all of you?
The other part is that left a deep impression is the maximising of
assets of the poorer 25% of the population. The emphasis it seems
is on creating assets for them, ie HDB flats. But aren't all HDB on
99 yr lease hold? Meaning, we don't actually own the flat, we are
merely tenants.
I guess what matters to the poor is bread and butter. What is the
point of having a roof over their heads when they MAY need to worry
about the bread and butter of their lives?
I guess the policy makers have done it again. Making policies on
wrong data input.
[/b]
Singaporeans overseas feel the FREEDOM of being able to
accomplish much by themselves, and are able to cope with the many
challenges that they face - which are more often then not, not so
insurmountable.
One can talk things out, reason with those in Authority, rules can
be bent, and at the very last resort - money talks louder.
Why are Singaporeans so helpless in their OWN Country ?
Or is their homeland truly their OWN, or is the homeland OWN BY
SOME OTHERS ?