Old assumptions and legal precedents based on men's positions as
main breadwinners and providers were too strongly biased in favor
of women in terms of maintenance provisions and asset divisions
causing hardship to too many men nowadays. In the long run, men
might switch off and vote with their feet and be deterred to get
married especially the successful ones. If past legislations were
antiquated or outdated then they should be updated
actually all tat is asked by robertteh is to make it fair to
both sides... Any one here do not want the law to be fair ? I also
agree tat women charter should be reviewed now since situation had
changed. The reasons why these laws exists to protect the women is
the same reason why it should be reviewed to protect the male.
