Having sex with with girls under the age of 16

Gordonator SG

which also bring us to another interesting question, if a female drunk a man and sleeps with/rape him and becomes pegnant. must the man take responsibility?

Ito_^ SG

x2. Neutral

surfer188 SG

I recommend for rape cases:

If within 24hrs or UNDER the "Time Frame of Physical Evidence to be Collected", the women "must" go thru a medical examinations for evidences of rape. Her spoken words will be taken in but should be not consider as evidence because physical evidence is enough for confirm a rape & is within the "Time Frame of Physical Evidence".

If it's already more then 24hrs or OVER the "Time Frame of Physical Evidence to be Collected", the words are considered to be taken in as evidence but with doubt flavourable to the mentioned "Attacker". Basically because one should face a crime done to you rather then hide it for sometime.

I know that if sex is non consensus, there is scratch marks at the gential areas. And these marks are very different from consensus sex or even consensus don't have marks. Also body hurt marks can determine estimate time of crime occur.

Sure most have seen "CSI" (Crime Sence Investigator). Modern science is a super tools to crime. There is no doubt about science used to support laws.

For molest cases: It's more like a Chicken & Egg I feel. Just touches is pretty difficult to be proven. Both complianant & defenant words are in doubt if without evidence & third party proves. Sure there is some space to be "LOOKED INTO".

Or someone can invent a device to prove molest?? Something to suck up all particule on the body for evidnce?? Time to call for "Young Invertors Award"

Tuatau SG

Originally posted by surfer188:
Or someone can invent a device to prove molest?? Something to suck up all particule on the body for evidnce?? Time to call for "Young Invertors Award"

If in doubt, just treat as lap dancers: "See, no touch".

Tuatau SG

Originally posted by Gordonator:
which also bring us to another interesting question, if a female drunk a man and sleeps with/rape him and becomes pegnant. must the man take responsibility?

If your idea of 'responsibility' refers to acknowledgement of the baby and subsequent marriage, then the answer is "no". Rape victims are not compelled by law to accept family responsibilities.

If your 'responsibility' refers to criminal justice, it must be proven that the act of sexual intercourse was not concensual, and that the man was unaware that he was having sex with his rapist before he could be acquited.

skyline63 SG

Because Singapore woman don't like their husband to go out and have sex in batam when they cannot even give her husband sex intercourse.

See, I told you not to disturb Singapore woman. Let them go and be alone on the shelf.

crazy monkey SG

go jump into the sea and kill urself Very Happy

Mozart SG

No wonder the marriage rate among Singaporean men is getting lower. They prefer to stay single and not have the Women’s Charter dangling precariously over their heads.

surfer188 SG

Marriage should be seen as

two people happily coming together, if have to leave/divorce do it happily & clear-cut.

Not:
Two People Happily coming together; SUE you big time with "Women Chapter" when thinks got bad. Crying or Very sad

Just too bad, Singapore have not update the Women Chapter. In fact I fully agree on the responsiblities on kids, but disagree of other fact inside.

Factors I disagree:

1. It should be base on "WOMEN" is a "recommended" custody parent. It should be base on what support "That" parent can give. Who can provide more for the kid should logically have the custody.

2. If "Wife" is working or having capbilities to work & support herself after a separations/divorce, her "Maintenance" should be cap/top limit. Because both should be responsible for their own future life, not depending on the ex-husband or take reference from what life-style was during marriage. What's gone is gone, One must work or built his/her future.

3. Maintenance for kids should be clearly stated that "Both" parents should pay how much. This is to clear general doubt that "ONLY" the "Payer" side amount is for the kids. Actually the total amount of $ available for kids is double of whatz written in the order, basing on each parent have 50% responsibilities towards the kids. Current practice only order that no cuatody parent to pay a certain amount, never state the custody parent's amount. It's very very easy to over-look or forget to "consider" the custody parent's side.

4. Should asset be equally divided base on $ contributions first. Then provide a sum/percentage for those women who are house-maker. Sum/percentage should also be cap base on number is years of contributions. Bearing in mind that House-Maker do have lesser responsibilities/work when contributing towards the total asset. The higher the total amount of asset the lesser the percentage, the lower amount of asset the higher percentage.

« Previous Page