Originally posted by ShutterBug:
Personally, till this date, I still cannot understand how
"digging the trainee's nostril to prevent him from holding his
breath while he is dunked in a tub of water", can be construed as a
[b]'Rash and Ignorant Act'???? It is a PURPOSEFUL act, and
one that led to the trainee's death by drowning!!!
How can even the word IGNORANT be used? Since when
does a person live, when he doesn't hold his breath underwater?
Since when was digging a person's nostril to prevent him from
holding his breath, regarded as IGNORANT???
Rash, I can identify with. But certainly the fact
that if one breaths in water one shall die, cannot be a fact that
is easily IGNORED.
The trial has a lot of BS if you ask me.
The sentence is still a cruel Joke to me....[/b][/b]
yes the trial is BS and the sentence is a cruel joke to many of
us who have connections with the people involved. But it is a cruel
joke in a way different to what u imagine it to be.
