Dear Barracuda,
I think the feeling is mutual. 
You see, it is I who make the comment about you, why would you want
to use the label "Opposition"? Hidden agenda on your part?
I didn't know people will get so upset about being defined as
Pro-PAP or PAP inclined.
Why you get so work up? The answer is pretty obvious,
Barracuda.
You are the agent. You want to keep your "middle ground" image and
whenever the opportunity arises, you will try to lump up everything
to put it as "Opposition".
And as I have said in my previous post, you suits every bit of the
agent.
You are here to pretend that you are the
"middle ground", "moderate" people, slowly moulding opinion of what
"middle ground" people should feel about "opposition". Whenever
there are chances, you will jump on it. You set traps, like asking
me whether certain news are being reported in HK, hoping that I
will fall into it. Nah. That wouldn't work on me. 
And you think this is the great opportunity to jump on me,
discrediting me as incapable or I refuse to "admit" and see the
short comings in my own suggestions....etc etc. Nah. You hardly
engage in debates with me. Even your comments on the Fine tuning of
the GRC system as well as the Sound Barrier is pretty amateurish.
You see things exactly like the PAP, using dollars and cents to
value things...even flats that are affected by noise along the MRT
tracks! Why would you want to value things and digitize things like
that when there are better options to improve things? That could
only come from PAP's mindset, treating people as digits and
statistics.
And of course, the votes is more important; you have repeated TWICE
about "be sure that you will not get my vote" since I appear in
this forum! I mean, for such a short span of time, you already made
up your mind TWICE? 
You are no "middle ground moderate", Barracuda! Your hidden agenda
is pretty obvious here.... its no longer a secret anymore! Now you
know why I put up the article on the psychological unit? 
Goh Meng Seng