To: Reyes,
It is my recommendation that before talking publicly about
practising disclosure, accountability and transparency, the basics
of what to disclose as well as reliability of sources of
information be established.
We do not know whether any corporate disclosures were based on
certain facts, data or figures from information flow independently
generated by work processes that existed or from secondary sources
or based on intuitive or ad hoc management. If the sources of
information are unclear or obtained only by interpretations or ad
hoc management processes, will such disclosures be useful or
objective? I suppose if we fail to maintain such integrity and
standards, at the end, our disclosures may lead to justifications
or concoctions?
So if the public asks for information about whether charitable
organizations are passing down donations received mostly to needy
people instead of only or mainly for management or artistes or
organizers, there will be many questions to be answered by the
charitable organizations themselves.
For example, what are the sources of information ? Are the
information from company accounts, balance sheets or work
processes? Donations and costs of events are to be verified by work
processes started from donation registers and quotations/registers
of artistes and fees and each one should be accounted for.
In disbursing payments to needy, a similar work process starting
from registers of needy folks and facts of investigations and
independence of verifications should generate information that can
be used to disclose to public or the press. Better still, processed
information can be published.
So I would strongly recommend that disclosure information be
obtained only from available information flow from work processes.
The best practice will be to plan works to be carried out in
component processes that generate information at the same time.
Only such sources will offer reliable first-hand information."

[/b][/quote]