Eric Mudasi
4:13pm Mon Jun 16th, 2003
So the national service is to be implemented come February 2004 -
the cost, a staggering RM500 million. Is there some sinister agenda
behind this? Why the secrecy? Is it really about instilling
patriotism, sense of unity and loyalty in our children?
I as a non-Muslim parent would like to ask pertinent questions
regarding the implementation of this 'rushed through project'. If
it is to instil loyalty by serving in an uniformed body, I after
serving 26 years in an elite fighting unit - having risked life and
limb for this country - do not have feelings of loyalty towards
this country.
Why? I have been used and discriminated against. Loyalty, I had,
but that was snuffed out of me, leaving me with lingering
resentment. Most non-Muslim parents do not know much about the
military service, and on their behalf, I would like to raise valid
and legitimate questions, after all, it is our tax money.
Does the national service organisation have professional and
impartial instructors? I doubt it. Why? Take for instance, General
(Rtd) Zaini Mohamed Said, who gave a directive not allowing
non-Muslim soldiers to pray in camps. Please refer to my letter to
malaysiakini, "Soldiers not allowed to pray" in February
2002.
This directive was issued after a discussion with his disgraced
boss General (Rtd) Md Noh Che Arshad, who was then chief of army
(disgraced - asked to leave the service for taking kick backs). All
these generals are from the Royal Malay Regiment the largest
infantry organisation in the Malaysian military and the most
polarised, as all are Malays, only Malays serve in these
regiment.
The majority of instructors in the military training establishments
are from this unit. They would not have an inkling about religious
and racial tolerance, it will even be worse down the ranks. If you
have bigots at the highest levels of the military, my question is
how on earth are they going to provide 'non-racist' instructors for
our precious impressionable young teens.
Soldiers of whatever religious persuasions whilst on parades are
forced to raise their hands like Muslims during the saying of the
grace (doa selamat). They do not have a choice or they are marked
men, but then they serve by choice. The pathetic excuse given is
that it is for uniformity.
What about our children? To me the children will have a choice, as
they have been conscripted (by decree), they do not have to raise
their hands come what may, unless they have a joint saying of grace
like in the US or the Indian Army. I would feel very offended if my
child was forced to raise her or his hands. I will not allow it nor
stand for it.
Is there any thought or effort going to be made for the religious
needs of the non-Muslims - Sundays for Christians, Tuesdays or
Fridays for Hindus and for people of other religious beliefs. Will
the training programme cater for this need? For the Muslim
conscript, this will be catered for as seen from the training
programme for the Malaysian Military Academy, or Atma. If you
notice here you do not see a semblance of anything to cater for the
non-Muslims.
This is the moment to make big bucks too. The army insists that all
officers wear and use a certain brand of belts from the UK, meaning
the Sam Browne belt - each costs something in the region of
RM300-plus. Only that is allowed, all others are not. The poor
officers cry when paying for them. RM300 might be a paltry sum for
some, but paltry too is the pay.
The same applies to shoes. The list goes on and that is only the
tip of the iceberg. Probably Umno needs to raise funds for the
soon-to-be called general election. What better way than through
the RM500 million?
I believe at the end of the day if all these unequal treatments are
not addressed, the conscripts will come out feeling like
second-class citizens. Not only that, it multiplies the
ill-feelings of the parents too towards the country. Parents are
unforgiving, if the above is not addressed seriously, the
by-products for these will be not loyal patriots. Is anybody out
there listening?