i think not... and totally not without repercussions... in doing
so, they would be considered in breach of treaty obligations.
Sg will probably sue and they'll end up having to compensate us to
not sell water to us if we win.
treaty obligations entail a certain commitment on the part of the
signatory states to adhere to the terms... if happy happy change
and render null and void, then why bother to sign them in the first
place?
now, it cannot be said that the m'sians signed the agreements under
duress, so they have no grounds to scream "injustice" after they've
enjoyed the benefits of cheap treated water for so long!
i say up theirs... and good call by Singapore to stop negotiating
with liars!