Let us observe how one assassinates a Great man in Africa!
Patrice Lumumba was assassinated by the Americans, in the name of
the cold war that the Africans have not ever invented. The
Belgians, who endorsed this coward assassination, are only
scapegoats. The Belgians, British and French, who were the right
arms of the Americans, encouraged this coward assassination. All
the Great Western powers need the richnesses of Congo. This State
d`Afric is the richest country, in basement, in the world. Even
Hitler wanted to monopolize this country in order to manufacture
its atomic bomb. After the Conference or the "Brutality" of Berlin,
the Belgians, who developed because of under ground congolais,
profited l`essor from the Belgian middle class. The Belgian system
is founded on a trilogy much imbriguée than in the other colonizers
forced:travail, exploitation of the richnesses and missions
Christian. In the years 1958, Patrice Lumumba arrives who refuses
paternalist l`action of missionnaires and l`exploitation without
condition of the richnesses congolaises. Westerners love not this
kind of character, volunteer, proud, humble, defender of social
justice, to control a rich country like Congo, without putting it
except d`état to harm. Many conflicts which generate nowl Afric,
c`est because of not called into question of our traced borders of
African blood and, especially, of the neocolonialism. Patrice says
this in 1960: "Congo is an area which is with l`interior d`une
Nation. This know Nation Africa ". This great man, to trust and
patriot, were a true African dignitary. In 1958, indicator that
nobody s`occupy of l`indépendance total of his people, it creates
the MNC (National Movement Congolais). In 1960, Congo is supposedly
independent. In May of the same year, it gains the legislative
elections. Therefore, it is named Prime Minister, tandisque Kasa
Vubu reaches the presidency in June 1960. L`become with the head of
the government congolais directed by the nationalist Patrice
Lumumba n`a not smiled to the Western powers. Anti-colonial,
unifying, prosovietic, communist, socialist, progressist, Patrice
Lumumba automatically precipitates l`alliance of Kasaï and l`union
Katangaise. July 10, 1960, of the Belgian troops are dispatched in
Elisabethville (Lumumbashi), the capital of Katanga, in order to
subdue a rebellion of l`army of Congo. Patrice Lumumba counteracts
and claims l`assistance of the United Nations. July 12, 1960, he
threatens to request l`help of the l`ex-USSR if the Belgian troops
do not to evacuate Katanga, July 19, 1960. Prosoviètique which,
requiring of the help Communists, wants to direct a rich country
like Congo, the Americans and Europeans "blessed yes yes" of the
Americans will never forgive it, because of the cold war. The
Security Council of l`ONU vote a resolution asking Belgium to
withdraw its troops which will be replaced by blue helmets, July
14, 1960. These blue helmets will unload on July 16, 1960.
September 15, 1960, s`il plait you, the Belgian minister Ganshof
Van-DER is dispatched in Congo to put Patrice Lumumba except d`état
to harm for the only Western economic interests which do not stop
to stuff us the craniums on the philosophy of the rights of the
men. September 19, 1960, c`est-with-statement three days after the
arrival du minister Ganshof Van-DER, colonel Mobutu, this 29 year
old young fellow, adhering to the National Movement Congolais (MNC)
of Patrice Lumumba, of which it becomes the men of confidence,
"close friend" of Patrice Lumumba, founds a college of the general
police chiefs automatically, thus replacing the bodies of the
capacity. This friendship resembles d`autres friendships:
Sankara-Blaise Compaoré and Marien Ngouabi-Sassou Nguesso.
November 15, 1960, in the Eastern province, the partisans of
Lumumba évincent the officers faithful to Mobutu and form a
government lumumbist in Stanleyville which will be recognized by
fifteen States progressists, of which Ghana de Nkrumah, l`Egypte of
Gamal Abdel Nasser, Guinea de Sékou Touré, etc... on 9 December
1960, handled by the Americans, Belgians, Britanniques and French,
the Belgian minister Ganshof Van-DER asks Mobutu to kill Patrice
Lumumba, in spite of the presence of the United Nations in Congo.
Automatically, colonel Mobutu stops Patrice Lumumba and send with
Elisabethville in Katanga, where it is assassinated on January 17,
1961. Here how a true African is assassinated. What is unhappy is
that this is an African who assassinated his own brother, in the
name of l`Occident. Dists me, my sisters and brothers, The men
Africa it not maudit forever?
http://membres.lycos.fr/african97160/;;;;;;;;;
Mr. president of the French, Allow me to come towards you taking
into account the difficult situation in which, you are spirit of
plunged the Ivory Coast, like d`autre country to Africa. If you
see, in me, an individual who you blames that of it could not seem
to you strange. And it is, however, truth that your responsabiltés
in the crisis of the Ivory Coast are immense. Mr Chirac, it-that
l`Afric, unintermitting martyr, did know since so-called
"independences"? Only social injustices; of l`exploitation of the
men by the men; nèo-colonialism most contemptible which dominated
during forty years; military and economic interventions which
bleed, exploit and devastate our populations; encouragements with
the conflicts for your only interests egoists. Because of you, Mr.
Chirac, the people of the Ivory Coast lives, since more than three
months, a crisis which it meurtrit painfully, affects the bases of
its social cohesion and threatens it in perenniality of its
national existence. Now, the awakening of the true nature of the
dangers which attack the Ivory Coast is known of everyone. Because
of you, Jacques Chirac, l`élan of development of the Ivory Coast,
itself, are broken; the investment productive is stopped and the
dependence, with the regard of your country, is worsened. These
measurements and their effects on the economic development and the
company open the way with the proliferation parasitic d`activities,
with the development of corruption, the practice on a large scale
of the nepotism and the clientelism, with the unrestrained race
with the enrichment easy and the conspicuous consumption. Like
consequences of these drifts, the cohesion s`est found fissured,
the work and l`effort destroyed like statutory values and the
confidence of the citizen in his institutions inevitably shaken.
Therefore, Mr. Chirac, remade not in Ivory Coast what you did in
CONGO BRAZZAVILLE where you drove out a democratically elected
President: PASCAL LISSOUBA. Yes, you armed, in the name of
l`exploitation of men by the men, your dictator Sassou Nguesso in
order to release loosely President Lissouba elected democratically
by the vote for all. By your cruelty, Mr. Chirac, increasingly
broad sides of the company congolaise and social categories,
increasingly many, live in precariousness and l`exclusion. The
young people, in particular, who constitute the crushing population
congolaise and his future, are struck in strong proportions by the
failure school, unemployment, the marginalisation and l`absence of
prospects social d`insertion. Because of the neocolonialism, of
l`exploitation of men by the men and the support which you bring to
the African dicateurs, in particular in Denis-Sassou Nguesso, of
new difficulties are profiled with l`horizon, related on the weight
of the foreign debt and interior and to the population increase
still very strong, with persistence d`une critical dependence in
the fluctuations of the oil markets, with the new challenges advent
that impose the universalization of l`economy like new technologies
of l`information and comminication in real time.
Because of you, Mr. Chirac, the democracy is broken is CONGO, the
institutions called into question, pluralism and the democracy, of
which l`approfondissiment and defense were to constitute your
essential priorities, as "a Defenseur of the democracy and the
rights of the men". Alas, you destroyed them by loosely drawing
aside a democratically elected president. Mr. Chirac, your country,
French, this always autoproclamé "country of the rights of
l`homme". Force is to note that this obsessing répétion ends up
transforming in l`esprit of the French citizen, l`error in truth:
French is respectful rights of men. You lie, Mr. Chirac, because
French not a ever respected the most elementary rights of the men
African. Therefore, your manners and your manners hardly concern
the democratic virtue. It is time, Mr. Jacques Chirac, that French,
your Fatherland, s`occuppe finally of its buttocks, because the
Africans are really tired of your cruelty. GREETINGS
ANTICOLONIALES!!!
http://membres.lycos.fr/african97160/;;;;;;;;
Yes, unisons us Men from the Ivory Coast! African Unisons Us! Any
action together for us African is a product of freedom. Therefore,
l`unity calls us in all the fields! Let us banish this democracy
which misleads eye in it, organize we and manufacture governments
d`Union national to be able to go straight towards a real unit of
our People d`Afric. We all are of the Men from the Ivory Coast,
Ghanaéns, of the Senegaleses, etc... the Coast d`Ivoire belongs to
l`Afric and this Africa appartent at the Ivory Coast. I am torn by
the brutality of the life, mechanceté and the silly thing of the
men, after the tragic events which proceeded in Rwanda. Blind
violence, violence absurdity: the forces of l`ordre, in very
l`Afric, took practice to kill and to terrorize in all impunity the
civil ones, in particular that belongs to ethnos groups different
from their or another religion which is theirs. L`Afric of the
AIDS; l`Afric exploited, bled, devastated, impoverished and our
dispersed people. I think that not answer will not be given to all
these evils, excluded only one: this not by nourrisant membership
religious or ethnique (which n`a no value, no future), of every man
for himself, nationalism, regionalism, insulation and the
ignorance, that we will find of the ways which are advantageous
with us. This in fraternity, solidarity, l`amity and the
comprehension which we will find our bohnor. Only fraternity will
enable us to take again confidence, so to link our People, all our
People. Without the Africans, all the Africans, this African unit
will not shape. Therefore, let us banish membership ethnique and
religieuse(elle is personal, the religion) to go straight towards
l`unity which wants to say freedom. With us of to indicate and to
mobilize all the Africans, white and blacks, yellows or reds, bus
this is together of the Africans who will be able to build l`Afric
of tomorrow. This XXIè century will be the battle of
l`intelligence, therefore of l`education, research and the culture.
Our nationalities do not existe absolutely, because they are null
and not avenues. The characteristic of l`ideology populist, one
knows, is it to mystify reality. Did we already forget the function
"TO DIVIDE FOR BETTER REGNER" and the dramatic consequences of the
nihilism? One cannot build a strong and powerful Nation by having
concerns primarily dependent on the religion, especially when this
one is enamelled d`iniquity and d`abjection. I wish that African
pragmatism give us perspicacity to sweep the pompeux speeches of
which result sprinkles the fields of hatred and sclerosis the
spirits. I wish that l`Afric s`enriches of its past to build a
future worthy of its genius. Our continent can be still rectified.
Thus let us mobilize our resources to work without slackening in
order to leave L`Afric the misery which, I am closely convinced, is
not a fate. Fraternity in continuity and l`union is the only way of
the free proclamation d`une Africa. If our leaders do not stop to
divide us between Musulmans and Christians, between hutus and
Tutsis, Dioulas and Baoulés, Peuls and Soussous, s`ils does not
n`arrivent to carry out our people, the poor, impoverished,
overexploited, towards their unit, the support which we can their
bring, will be to regard them as traitres, neocoloniaslists who are
corrompus by inherent pouvoir(phenomene of the world of the
policy). Our opposition in their connection will be done by the
means of the civil company; we will remain plain and vigilents to
make respect our rights and our DIGNITE. Then, that quelqu`un wants
or not, we will seize freedom to show us active, interdependent and
plain! IN THE NAME OF THE REASON, MEN FROM THE IVORY COAST, UNISONS
US, BECAUSE ANY ACTION TOGETHER FOR US MEN FROM THE IVORY COAST AND
AFRICANS EAST A PRODUCT OF FREEDOM
In very l`Afric, our famous defenders of the rights of l`homme
created various leagues: League Sénégalaise of the rights of
l`homme, league congolaise of the same rights of l`homme, etc...
Yes, there are leagues of the rights of l`homme everywhere in
Africa, whereas our collective rights are completely ridiculed. On
our premises, in Senegal, French has a VETO there. This last means
that we are always colonized by French, because this it which
represents us in the United Nations. Why n`a one not stopped the
French, at the time of the Rwandan génocide? Why actors of
l`apartheid not worried by l`Opinion international? Because
l`Africain n`a no dignity. This wants to say that the International
right inéxistant in Africa, at is made indignant and always
colonized. What thus does those which represent us with the various
international organizations? In this case, do we need the Africans
who are represented with l`ONU? Why make? - a League Man from the
Ivory Coast of the Rights of the men, in colonization, whereas the
Men from the Ivory Coast die free - a Secretary General of the
United Nations, in event Kofi Annan (Here the first living corpse).
- Of the Spokesman of Office of the High Commission of the United
Nations for the individual rights of Men. - representatives for
INTERNATIONAL AMNESTY for the same individual rights of the rights
of Men. - Presidents or vice-presidents of the International
Federation of the individual rights of Men. - the In charge ones of
the questions of International Justice to the same International
Federation. - leagues sénégalaise, congolaise, of the Ivory Coast,
Rwandan... of the individual rights of men. Not, l`Afric n`a more
need for this defamatory stain. All aren't these Africans informed?
N`est this not a beautiful world, my sisters and brothers? Yes,
they are there to defend the rights of men, the individual rights
of men, whereas their people live under the absolute
neocolonialism. Unthinkable C`est. Is this qu`en defending the
individual rights of men, our various representatives with l`ONU or
with INTERNATIONAL AMNESTY, they defends our collective rights, our
dignity? Not, Not and Not C`est invraissemblable. Qu`est this which
we have in our small heads? 50 years of misleading declaration, we
still have not anything included/understood or we do not want to
include/understand. 50 years of the neocolonialism, of
dictatorship, d`exploitation without condition of our richnesses
and military frenzy, we accept, respect and venerate this
philosophy of the individual rights of men, whereas our people are
always colonized. http://membres.lycos.fr/african97160/;;;;;;
If the individual rights of men profit caution from our various
representatives, the collective rights, them, are relegués to the
second plan by political opportunism or personal ambitions. How,
sincerely, can one defend the individual rights of men whereas the
collective rights neither are respected, nor defended? How can
these living corpses, which represent us universally, make respect
our personal freedoms whereas our collective freedoms are
completely ridiculed? And yet, there N ` ever was personal freedom
without collective freedom. How can our dictators, who control us,
respect our individual rights, whereas our collective rights are
ridiculed by the Western powers, those same which created l`ONU and
the declaration known as universal? International law? It gives to
a country its legal consistency; it must seek to limit the
conflicts and to facilitate the international relations. When did
it l`ONU put an end to a conflict in Africa? These organizations of
the so-called rights of men are numerous. Each organisation(there
are at least 200 of them: United Nations, the World Health
Organization, etc...) must answer different concern according to
the Member States and the goal of its action. The divergences
interests between the States, the need for surmounting them
peacefully, is the role of the international law, like its name
l`indic. Are the United Nations of the United Nations? to question
can. Was Dabord, how born this Organization? It was during the
Second world war that Roosvelt (l`Américain), Churchill
(l`Anglais), and Stalin (Soviètique) met in Téhéran(Iran) in
November 1943 in full world war. These three personalities,
dominating the world, estimated qu`une international organization
would be necessary to regulate the world problems once, returned
peace. A préparative Conference, bringing together delegates
American, British, sovietic and Chinese, took place of August 21 at
October 07 1944 in the United States. The broad outline was traced,
supplemented with YALTA in February 1945. Pay attention what I will
say: It say, from the very start, that the United States and the
l`ex-USSR were going to be the dominating powers of l`après war and
that only a co-operation between these two Nations and their
existence could allow the correct operation of l`ONU. And now,
l`Union Soviètique n`exist more. No Nation n`a taken its place. No
Nation can say "Not" to the Americans, no countervailing power. A
capacity, which n`est not supervised, is a dictatorship. C`est
American DIKTAT. Therefore, l`ONU died with the l`ex-USSR. In this
case, one can to question of l`existence of the international law,
his progress, of his operation, his range and, especially, his
future, because l`Europe Unie is far be plain.
But why not l`Afric plain? Let us recall that the shortly after the
Second World war, in December 1945, after the discovery of the
atrocities Nazis, qu`est born this universal Declaration of the
rights of l`homme pourque the white do not disappear because of
their beliefs (cruelty). Only one and single ambition: To defend
and protect the individual rights of men, then that not African
State n`était supposedly independent, excluded l`Afric of the South
of the racist white. Thus us, African, this colonial declaration of
the rights of men hardly concerns us. Do you know, why? because we
live in small areas, qu`on can call associations. It is not enough
to d`avoir a territory manufactured by the colonist, a population
joined together by the colonist and a governmental authority
administered by the colonist to claim to have a Nation. Do our
People continue to suffer, but with which to ask for memory? Yes,
since the slavery while passing by colonization and the
neocolonialism, our People suffer because of impotence of the
Africans and their basement. Yes, l`Afric is the richest continent
in the world, richer than all the others joined together. Why,
devil, the inhabitants of l`Afric are poorest in the world? When
will we learn how to defend l`Afric, its natural richnesses and the
inhabitants who make it up? In spite of the creation of l`ONU and
its thousands various d`organisms d`assistance, in spite of the
Universal Declaration of the rights of l`homme and the citizen, in
spite of multiples and interminable international conferences, in
spite of many efforts more or less not involved and more or less
skilful; governments Western, institutions international,
multinational, international banks, expert, co-operating,
mercenaries, secret agents, "humanitaires"(une mine of vipers)
compete to exploit and impoverish the poor people d`Afric. Here are
almost 50 years that we are supposedly "independent". L`Occident
exploited these false independence to make a modern slavery of it.
A slavery, obviously, nourished by the DIVISION OF L`AFRIQUE. Since
these so-called "independences", our People were in mourning during
almost 50 years. Fifty years of génocide, of civil wars,
d`exploitation without condition of their richnesses, the
neocolonialism most contemptible, the HAND OF L`OCCIDENT MAKES the
GESTURE OF L`INSTINCT AND NOT THAT OF the REASON. Such an amount of
d`années cruelty, of French soldiers, French mercenaries, French
d`"humanitaires ", of French co-operation of Shit, arrests and
judgments arbitrary, external attacked , blows d`Etat, false
lawsuit, of physical l`elimination of our African patriotic truths,
lie, silence(boucher the ears and to close the eyes), the WORD
STAMMERS
BUT A WHICH TO ASK MEMORY? With people aficain decapitated of its
history, to which one lied in depth of its existence, with which
one always trampled l`honnor and the dignity, with which one
underdeveloped economically and culturally, with which one divided
to reign eternally? To people qu`on made deaf, dumb and blind man
of his own culture and its own civilization, dedicated to remember
only daily miseries, of l`injustice sociale(allant with l`encontre
fundamental principles of freedom), suffering to which, is
condemned to perpetuity? But will the memory of the facts and the
gestures be retained like an extenuating circumstance? Now, all
protagonists of the crisis of the Ivory Coast récrute of the
mercenaries in Bob Denard ". And yet, the mercénariat is prohibited
by the international authorities. But, let us speak about l`enfant
Bob Denard. Since long years, Bob Denard sowed terror in Africa,
since long years it was supported by all the presidents of the
French Republic, of which the soldier Of Gaulle, l`echangist George
Pompidou, the macaque Valéry Giscard d`Estaing, the génocidaire
Mitterand and the Chirac thing. Yes, since long years, Bob Denard
sows terror in this impotent, divided Africa, bled, exploited and
meurtrie. Truth-statement, it is goat-emissary d`une political
hybrid of French in Africa. No French n`a raised the small one must
for saying STOP. Children Bob Denard rendered services enormous to
French. Children Bob Denard is a special mercenary correspondent
for the account of French l`Etat in Africa. This mercenary showed
of all the colors to the African populations always under the
absolute neocolonialism. In the Comoros, in 1978, Bob Denard and
its mercenaries take the control of the country and physically
eliminate the president who was in place. Bob Denard puts President
Abdallah at the capacity, qu`il had relieved in 1976. And all that
by the d`Americ complicity of l`ONU and the United States which
fights aujourd`hui against terrorism, in the name of justice
without border. In 1989 Bob Denard, special correspondent by the
génocidaire Mitterand, keep silent President Abdallah and
monopolize of the capacity. My sisters and brothers, there n` is
qu`en Africa qu`on sees similar things. Since be-saying
independence of the Comoros, there was more than 17 governments
because of l`oppression of this French Republic, twisted blow, the
attempt scorched earth policy at dismissal, whereas the Africans
n`ont nothing with saying. That which says to you that l`Africa is
not a wet hen, it lied. impotence of the Africans to take their
destiny in hand is an overpowering proof there. It is certain that
Bob Denard is goat-emissary. Not only it worked with all the
Presidents of this French Republic, but also with all the French
secret service. To start with the DGSE, the DST, etc... Let us take
an example: MMC(Mission Militaite de Coopération) is a terrorist
co-operation. A theoretically autonomous organization, but
practically attached to cabinent terrorist minisètre of the
co-operation. It is directed by a General of the French national
Defense and which manages, appears it, 17% of the budget of the
co-operation. The d`assistance heads from this MMC, brought by
children wonder Bob Denard, collect, filter or incite the requests
of the African persons in charge put at the capacity by French such
as: the thing Sassou Nguesso, the new Bongo Moslem, the thing
Idriss Déby, the Eyadema bloodthirsty man, etc. Or many Africans
who, protected by the this French Republic from DANTON and friendly
ROBESPIERRE "from l`Afric", want to be presidents.
http://membres.lycos.fr/african97160/;;;;;;;;;
The MMC? Its field d`action is the same one as that of its ministry
of supervision. Like this field, since be-independences, n`a ceased
to extend with the old Belgian, Spanish and Portuguese colonies,
the number of African countries concerned doubled since the
génocidaire Mitterand imposed the democracy to the Africans who are
always in total l`indignity. It s`agit not only to to widen this
bordelle of francophonie, but to present itself at these countries
like an alternative to the old supervisions. This because children
Bob Denard that French has delighted Rwanda, Zaïre(actuelle RDC),
Burundi with their Belgian godfather; Equatorial Guinea and
l`Angola with their Spanish and Portuguese fasteners. With
creation, in 1983, Fast Force Action (FAR), the French authorities
dared, in the name of the reason, by the complicity of Bob Denard
and Paul Barill, VRP(Voyageur Representing Canvasser) in
mercénariat, of go in Africa. There exists on the black continent,
always colonized, four specialized divisions of this force which is
not that defamatory stain. What does it make in Africa? This of
international terrorism. Bob Denard advised in Bernard Kouchner to
serve l`alibi while going to the South of Sudan to help the victims
of the famine and the massacres. This same Bob Denard encouraged
Jean Christophe Mitterand, the son of the génocidaire Mitterand, to
leave to North Sudan to sell weapons in Omar El Béchir. In only one
country, French is in the South for humane reasons ett in North to
sell weapons. That which says to you that French is not a terrorist
State in Africa, it lied. At tomorrow my sisters and brothers,
because Sékou Touré is tired!
Yes, the presence of the French soldiers in Africa is an insult
with our people. These images, showing l`army French unloading or
stationing in Africa, are a defamatory stain! You have not
understood that French confiscated l`indépendance the l`Afric black
one because of Léopold Sédar Senghor and d`Houphouët Boigny. How I
have shame to be an African, shame of my existence! Intellectual
pseudos, which are only wet hens, break the mouth for a democracy
which n`a not of name; intellectual male prostitutes, whose people
live in total l`indignity, see only their personal future;
intellectuals, who are only gourous, spend their time still
dividing the African people. These Africans, who act in this
manner, not have included/understood yet not understood that c`est
the time of universalization, those of the accounts and the hard
truths. And l`Afric, once again, out of modern time because l`Afric
n`a is pushed ever be independent. Exploited, bled, devastated and
marginalized in the international exchanges, l`Afric is recipient
from only 7% of flows of capital. Thus once again, l`Afric is
excluded from the world growth. More serious still political
l`instability structural of the States vis-a-vis wave of shock of
this universalization appears. The answers differ depending on the
States, but the jolt is the same one everywhere: it reaches the
legitimacy of the structures and involves brutal degradation. It
accompany e violence inouïe: famine, exodus of mass of our
populations, civil wars, génocides, etc... No African can close the
eyes and stop the ears in front of this defamatory stain where the
People, which n`ont ever fought for their rights, undergo any kind
of consequences to the name "of the civilized values" imported. It
ya much of problems unsolved in Africa. Instead of attack with the
latter and to work with their solutions, the African intellectuals
hang with front-axle unit of the imperialists Euro-Americans and
impose by the force of the weapons leurs"proppres reforms "d`un
economic system and policy become completely anachronistic. Any
watch which these obsolete forces became an obstacle with the
progress of the African continent. One of the most significant
lessons of XXè century is than the People d`Afric must to link in
order to combine together, or to disappear definitively. This
century also showed that this not the power of the Americans and
Européens "benis yes yes" of the Americans which is decisive, but
the force and the power of the People. Our success depends on our
capacity to overcome ethniques and official fundamentalisms which
dominate l`Afric. A more difficult objective d`autant qu`aucun
work, in this direction, is not still carried out on the ground and
qu`il n`exist, to date, no movement of mass to stop this
phenomenon.
French cruelty in Africa!!! Did all the political community french
(right-hand side and left confused, elites and intellectuals),
religious movements and trade unions mobilize on May 26, 1996,
place of Trocadéro(place of rights of the men?) in Paris to express
against cruelty. Why this demonstration did take place? Because he
have assassinated seven monks Trappists in Algeria. Why, devil,
French as not-such step wildly bombarded its soldiers in Algeria?
Why, devil, French it encourages, with 2002, cruelty in Africa? A
French nation terribly humiliated in 1940, crapotant under German
l`occupation, deprived in five years of all its dignity, with on
the arms the dirty war d`Algery, the génocide biafrais, the
conflict tchadien, the Rwandan génocide, the génocide congolais,
the conflict angolais... A pains all that digested, here that this
French nation pains to recognize the consequences and the causes of
the cruelty which, j`en am persuaded, is not an invisible power.
Cruelty? It east human, bus the man is a true animal which kills
without reason, but its causes are inhuman and degrading: weapons,
colonization, occupation, humiliation, injustice, fanaticism,
dictatorship, etc... That`Hitler occupied all l`Europe, by aiming
at the Juive race, freedom and the dignity of the occupied people
was trampled, like does it now French in Africa. It was the cruelty
of the last century. When white(French them, Irish, English...)
occupied l`Americ North and l`Americ South, they exterminated the
populations otochtones (Indiens, Aztèques, Incas, Mayas...), it was
cruelty with l`état pure. While encouraging cruelty in Africa and
exploiting without shame the richnesses of the black continent, why
the Africans come won't to French? And yet, the respect of the
rights of the political and economic People d`Afriqe(droits) and
the fight against l`immigration are two facets d`une even
requirement. Therefore, French dared to put the question of the
rights of the African people to lay out -same, by economic
opportunism, as if the "negros" were occupied by l`Allemagne Nazi,
or developed enough for that sells to them missiles or the ultrast
nec of its techniques, but not enough to accomodate a good
technology which has proven reliable at it for two centuries: THE
DEMOCRATIE, THE TRUE ONE. Therefore, French can make all the
possible administrative decisions, to manufacture texts of law
inhuman and degrading, it will solve the problem of l`immigration
only if, and only if, it signs the respect of the d`Afric dignity
of the people and it gives up its privileges on the black
continent. http://membres.lycos.fr/african97160/;;;;;;;;.
Does French have a DUTY OF MEMORY? Yes, this continuous French, in
year 2002, to devastate, Bleed and meurtrir l`Afric, does it have a
DUTY OF MEMORY? TIME OF PEACE AND TIME OF WAR!!! TIME OF WAR! The
French needed the Africans. 14-18, we took part in the release of
French of DANTON, ROBESPIERRE and Saint-just. Warlike recognition
of the Africans n`a ever proven by this French Republic, in times
of peace. TIME OF WAR, the French always need the Africans! 39-45,
when French was occuppée by Nazi Germany, it needed the Africans
without their imposing a residence permit. Why, devil, in TIMES OF
PEACE, request-tone a residence permit to the descendants of the
Senegalese riflemen? Why this French behave does like a Banana
republic? Why this French, released by the Senegalese riflemen,
impose does a residence permit to the Black Africans? Why does it
arbitrarily imprison these Africans who is not asked to come here
to French, in TIMES OF WAR? Why this French have not imposed a
residence permit on Hitler? Does French encourage cruelty in
Africa? Questions to answer for those which have not lost their
memory! Our continent is a true scene of theatre because of only
French: Rally Paris-Dakar or Grenade-Dakar which kills our
citizens, our grounds, our trees, our animals, all our environment,
one appaludit by singing the Marseillaise; illegal detentions of
our fellow-citizens in French because of a maudite residence permit
or massive expulsions in "the Charters" of our sisters and brothers
perpetrated by Pasqua-Cress-débré, one speaks about friendship and
co-operation; undesirable African students in French which one
expels like gangsters or wild beasts, one speaks about the
francophonie. All that is unworthy for us African. The divine
reward is neither to serve e man, nor to have dollard, this is
dignity. Therefore, one have more right to defend the francophonie,
if we are normal and intelligent Men. To lose in a company, this
not more to die of hunger, this not be assigned with residence
supervised by this French Army. This French military presence, in
times of peace in Europe, is an insult with our people, a
defamatory stain. Therefore, no African have not right of to amuse
with army French which insults our people. My brothers, our People
are considered, by French, commes "animals". These People always
lived politically, economically, militarily dependent on French, in
times of peace, they always lived in the negation, l`indignity. To
finish, I wonder whether French does have a duty of memory with
respect to the Africans, IN TIMES OF PEACE? It is necessary that
this French knows that CRUELTY EAST a VERY LONG INJUSTICE!
They are the Men who make History and not the Submen .
I am 100% Blacks, I have a Universitaire level of the
Art-and-Trades, I am Moule 97160 Guadeloupe. Reserved only with the
BLACK Race. Black only, 100%. American-Cd & African-Cd 1000 MP3
Black, I Weigh: 3 billion euros.
http://membres.lycos.fr/african97160/