Reality and Perception
Few people have come to a level whereby reality and perception are
often regarded as the veracity of an upright hero compared to the
mendacious devil on a stage with no concealment. Although this is
sure a mean way of categorizing the above proclamation, it does
however, place the discrepancies of this two in a much brighter
light.
"Seeing is believing".
How contradicting the statement goes. Seeing. The sighting of
physical existence could and can never be without a tooth which has
never failed to contact its gum. On the contrary, the same could
not be said for the word believing. When someone believes in
something, it is so inevitable along the path that he has to shower
his imaginary faith on that object. Always under the impression
that something will come good some time long enough.
Holding a certain view either of the majority or by the self does
not necessarily predestinate its mortal presence! It is certainly
easy to link these two together in the course of constructing a
sentence that it is deceiving to the mind at times.
Perception is always in tandem with non-concrete mind sculpture,
and often it is just another notion from the brain nerve set to
view another material, be it information or just plain straight in
the face. It's just like taking a look at a hunk who seemed to have
anything and everything in parallelism and everything suggests
unblemished returns (perception again). We have not seen the truth
yet. The likelihood of this individual surviving our high hopes
retains its stealth. To a person who embraces the concept of
judgement is always a victim of perception, or even much to remark
that the latter conveys the former is no inaccuracy on anybody's
part.
A judgement is merely comparable to an estimated value of wealth
that rides high on imagination until the gold's placed on the
weighing pan. Even when that gold statue is weighed and the result
being challenged by the naked eye (seeing?), one could not help but
think of the gold statue, which might have been vacant in its
heart! By melting it to molten form could solve the problem. But it
does not rectify the formation of yet again the Great Perception
that arises from presuming it is solid gold and even having a value
in the first place!
Thus is it appropriate to declare that reality actually brings
about perception? That would mean the intended definition for
"Seeing is believing" that most people assumed is incorrect, or
whoever spouted that phrase did not mean it that way in the first
place! From the above explanation, "Seeing is believing" could have
been taken as the state of perceiving from reality, the before and
after phase.
Sliding into Reality, it is really, how things are and not just
made out to be. The onus of it all is that the facts have to be
substantially simplified to be able to dish out a clear picture.
Human beings have unceasingly been buying the saucer that comes
with the cup. The fact that a cup is a cup emerges silver-worthy.
Even with a tablecloth to wipe off any possible imperfection on the
glass table seems scanty to the eyes. And that is why a hunt for
the saucer evolves, perhaps to ascertain the truth.
"This is a cup. This IS definitely A CUP."
"NO! You can't call this a cup because it has no handles!"
"Yeah right
..Should I call it a glass then? Or should I name it a
mug because it is much wider and taller than what you call a
cup?"
Seriously, my original perception of the above is that a cup is
shaped just like the letter "c". And "Cup" just has that scooping
feeling, like when you scoop water from a pond with your hands. You
cup this and you cup that. Yeah that's how it sounds like. And a
clenched fist would appear massive, resembling a mug. You put that
massive thing into your mouth and you would go
"Mmmmmmm
..Mmmuuu
.uuuu
ggggg
.Mmuhhhhhhhhh
..Mug."
Mug. Precisely.
Flask. Have you ever heard the sound it makes when hot drinking
water is poured out of it?
"Ffffrrruuurrrr
.ssssppppppp
.Flaaassskkk." Flask.
I believe the ones who engineered the dictionary had THAT
perceiving outlook when they saw the structure of those liquid
containers that they should be termed this way. Well that is MY
Perception. Had to be. I saw the cup on the table with my own eyes,
it has to be a cup and I have to think about something to convince
myself that it's a cup and not a mug, or why it IS a cup and not a
mug. Things get a wee bit more complex when it drops deeper into
the pit, and it's how you perceive the pit to be.
Things are brought into existence with the purview that it should
be kept elementary, like books. It's a fact that the printout for
your phone bill comes up to a few hundred dollars but its how we
often discern ourselves that someone else in the family is using
the dial more than the other family member. At least thats how my
mother injects her mind with.
Reality is real. Per-cept-ion, with the cept, certainly signifies
an evasive aura. It is remarkably simple to explain that real and
unreal predicament that it is often forgotten that despite the
differences these two phenomenon can synchronize so befittingly.
The magnified interest in it holds an unceasing count of pointers
that could lead to a debate of the same measure. It could be said
that we look at Reality as a stepping stone for us, whereas
Perception as an understanding that we might be able to pace
ourselves past the boundary and achieve something in life.
However, it might account for unjust convictions as well along the
way.
Just like my boss who had once labeled me as being slothful when I
had absolutely nothing on my bloody hands to do.
So how vast does the two notions go???
------------------
Chromeheart Minds: The Endless Search for Intellectual Freedom