TS,
Muse over this
Two wolves (being, INNER) reside in each of us, the first is
needs, fears, beliefs (eg, customs, traditons, religion),
jealousy,comparing sympathy,possesivness, insecurity, fear of loss
, anger, prejudice, always reacts ... the second
is love, kindness, emphaty , gratitude, unlimiting beliefs
always
responds.
The one that is fed daily evolves - whom are u
feeding, even as u are reading it now?
Both is love - but with a BIG difference - the first
is a relationship, the second relates to what IS.
the first is ego- based
personality! - it eventually suffocates and kills
the... (one remains accidental/stuck on the periphery) - the bird
is always trying to take off but wings are always clipped - cos
love has become bondage here - the giving here is to take back
(lots of expectations) - though one assumes that one is sharing in
reality one is a burden on another. One is being selfiish here.Why?
cos one is being a burden when one expects the other to
change, conform, fulfil ... Here it is fear-based needs
(not love) and the anxiety is there to quickly make it a
relationship. One is insecure. One is or remains
shallow. One is mired in a pond! One remains a seed, a mere
potential.Relationship is or used as a mechanism: using
... putting aside, using again and so on so forth. The
other or another is a means to an end to one's needs,
expectations and ...
the second is soul-infused
individuality! - it is everflowing abundant
phenomena (essential/centre), it is a bird on a wing - one
wing is love, and the other is freedom - love is freeing - the
giving here is simply sharing what one IS, appreciating what IS.
Here it is love unto itself and one simply relates - one is
self-FULL
here. One flows with existence like a river and partakes of
what the other 'is'.One is abundantly rich within - hence
one relates
without fear(s) and one has no reason(s) to love. One has plunged
to the very depths of one's being and the seed within has
blossomed. Here the love is in motion, hence the word
'relating'. The means and the end(s) are unto themselves.
Relationship is tenuous, relating is beautiful. Relationship is
one thing, interdependence totally another. Relationship means one
is separate; one independent and so is the other, and one decides
to relate. Relationship is not interdependence, it is a contract
bet two independent persons. Hence most relationships are
'shallow', because basically independence is false or
misintepreted. Nobody is independent -- and if one is not independent how can one
relate? With whom can one relate?
The predicament of many is that they search and desire 'answers' on
all four quarters outside
of themselves and prop themselves up with
whatever that resonates/validates them. However, they overlook
this: it is a prop, when it is removed or gone ... one is bound to
collapse. The 'answers' are and have been all along within; what is missing
is the essential, the accidental - aplenty!
The above is metaphysical n expansive - not confined to
relationships or marriage but other areas of one's daily ... and
what- have -you.
PS - two personalities can only relate when they are conscious
of their personas and know that behind the curtain of .... are two
throbbing individuals. Otherwise, it is at most superficial n
shallow - one never penetrates to the core of the other's
individuality.
Superimposed on a circle - one can only understand, accept n
transcend, one
cannot improve on a circle! The centre is being essential; the
circumference(periphery) is being accidental
Centre means - having a porous ego. self-'full' - one simply
flows n responds
Accidental means - one is egoistic, one lives with 'what was' or
'what it should be' and one reacts
Thanks Fugazzi, thanks for expanding on your earlier post. Very
profound words you've got there. Very psychological and very
philosophical. I totally appreciate your perspectives. Maybe you're
just so right........the answers all lie within....and we should
accept what IS, then the love flows........thanks. Very touched by
your answers. Really.