ok, taken a quote from the commercial - (a typical torque
converter has 80-85% efficiency, but these new versions
achieve up to 92%, according
to ZF)
92% efficiency under phyicsal testing or
controlled environment testing? time frame that 92% were
breached? before or after coefficient of thermal expansion kik
in?
did ZF post their dyno test report?
n you still beleive those commercial reports?
F1 are using modified powertrains and you cannot compare them
with those car you buy off the shelf
I will let this argument rest here
i will not allow the arugment to rest here...
no way...
u dun come in here without answering our questions... without
giving a firm rebuttal...
but juz pasting whatever u read with vague understanding...
and expect to end the argument on YOUR note...
that wun do...
firstly... when did we ever say we read from commercials... why
did u kept insisting we read from commercials..
and can u site the source????
and dun put in scicentific terms like coefficient of thermal
expansion... pls define this term and explain how it is relevant to
our discussion here....
(fyi i have studied 2 pure thermodynamics modules in uni and if
u are trying to smoke me on this u are dead meat)
and in which part of the discussion did we ever compare to F1
cars.. and F1 cars DUN use torque convertors...
looks like u have lotsa explanation to do....
