IMO, the feeling of cheapo is
there when riding A95..not sure why.
So far, A22s/A24s already faces some issue. You have the glue
filling coming apart(on the A22 doors, can see from the nearside
seats) etc. No doubt A95 will become like that sooner or
later..Even seats that are not
fixed properly are spotted..where's the quality?
Looking at the Wright, quite surprise that 1 of the WEG flooring
starts to come out. Some of them have that creaking sounds too..but
they are still surviving well though.
ADL uses plastic "like toys", aren't the others too? I know many
bus fans went to "knock" on the side walls at the upper deck front,
but mind that it's hollow..just added for design purpose. After so
long, I've only seen the BS Sign having issue..other than that,
nothing much. Given that the ADL vibrates a lot, they should shown
signs of wear and tear easily if their bodywork quality is
poor.
I can say that if ADL buses is bodied by GML, the bodywork will
sure giveway soon. A95 is lucky that the bus is quiet and less
vibrative, the impact taken is lesser than A22s..
One of your "good" quality Enviro 500s taken when it was a month
old. Seems that your comment on things not being fitted properly is
applicable here.

I think you have to realise asthetics is a separate issue to the
structural issues that concern the buses. An Enviro may look nicer
than a Gemilang, but the E500 body structure just doesn't seem as
strong as even a China bus. Even China buses don't produce that kind
of creaks. The bus just doesn't feel as safe as it should be for
passengers.
Well, the Enviros are still new, we will see what kind of
condition they will be in when they are the age of the PSV (CDGE)
B9TLs. And The PSV B9TLs don't have that kind of creaks from the
body, its a strong body just that it has a vibration
issue.
I doubt the Enviro 500 body will last, structually that is,
regardless of who is assembling it. And have you seen the quality
of the roof sheeting from above, its atrocious, never seen a new
bus with such wavy roof before. You want to know why Gemilang and
Wright doesn't have this? Because Wright and GML don't roll the
roof sheeting onto the roof structure, the technology used by
Wright and GML are similar (if I'm not wrong, the Alusussie
technology), and involves properly and precisely (ie machine)
bending the metal to its required shape, instead of just rolling a
sheet of metal and affix it (most likely with SikaFlex) to the roof
structure.