Asexuality has been around since ancient times. Not everyone
breeds or has a biological urge to breed you know. Denying its
existance won't change facts.
And what makes you think that just because humans NEEDED to be
polygamous doesn't mean they were polygamous out of a cultural need
to survive (lets face it they were not stupid even back then)
rather than a biological need? Its not as if u're the expert here.
Saying people were a certain way in the past is hardly supporting
evidence for polygamy as the ONLY nature belonging to humans. I
personally would not try to support a mathematically almost
impossible chance that humans were/still are EXCLUSIVELY
polygamous by nature because thats just silly. Logic dictates that
a mixture of both has always been the most likely, whether its
10,000 BC or 2008 AD.
okay la.. lol.. I'm not trying to be what expert leh.. don't get
me wrong. I guess it's right that there are asexuals in the olden
times, but not documented la..
how about let's just say humans are mostly polygamous by nature
leh? you'll have to agree if not temptations won't work liao..
don't kill me please~
