Bus Terminal, Interchanges & Depots

last SG · 2015-09-25T18:44:25+00:00

Anyway Sengkang still has space for 2 more services if they make 86 and 87 loop there.

SBS 9256 X SG

Heard that Hougang Depot will take back Eunos Interchange including service 93 once GA takes over Punggol.Bedok North Depot will partial control service 16,48 and 59.

Long time never see Tridents at Boon Lay Int(154).

I dun think Svc 76 will be dual controlled by HGDEP...

The last Trident was on Express 502.. Hahas... Nt my favourite bus to be on Express 502

TIB 585L SG

I dun think Svc 76 will be dual controlled by HGDEP...

The last Trident was on Express 502.. Hahas... Nt my favourite bus to be on Express 502

If 76 went to HGDEP, might as well put 25 to HGDEP also

carbikebus SG

I dun think Svc 76 will be dual controlled by HGDEP...

The last Trident was on Express 502.. Hahas... Nt my favourite bus to be on Express 502

Of course not for svc 76 since it will be under GCM next year

SBS3004X SG

Strangely there are no HGDEP/AMDEP dual comtrol services. I know there used to be one (50).

carbikebus SG

Strangely there are no HGDEP/AMDEP dual comtrol services. I know there used to be one (50).

Used to have 161 under both Hgdep/Amdep..Defu lane to Ang Mo Kio controlled areas also quite close.109/118 also no need for Bndep to control also.Now Amdep/Slbp also dont have..Last time 52 is under Slbp/Amdep

TIB 585L SG

I prefer 52 go to TT instead of 66 due to distance

carbikebus SG

I prefer 52 go to TT instead of 66 due to distance

Ya lor...143 i prefer stick with SBST..TT should take 105.Should give TT 174,179,181 and 198 over those 4 Clementi svc.Likewise for svc 136.LTA should give service 29 better or at least svc 109.

shellstation SG

New bus stops spotted right outside Tampines Interchange.

For svcs that will be terminating at Int Extension to stop so commuters can alight at that bus stop for convenience?

carbikebus SG

New bus stops spotted right outside Tampines Interchange.

For svcs that will be terminating at Int Extension to stop so commuters can alight at that bus stop for convenience?

Tampines Councourse?

dupdup77 SG

New bus stops spotted right outside Tampines Interchange.

For svcs that will be terminating at Int Extension to stop so commuters can alight at that bus stop for convenience?

Hi mr shell station, a good chance for sbs 68 to be introduced from pasir ris int to pass by this area on the way to tampines ave 8? Cheers. Thanks.

carbikebus SG

Hi mr shell station, a good chance for sbs 68 to be introduced from pasir ris int to pass by this area on the way to tampines ave 8? Cheers. Thanks.

Im afraid its not SBST but LTA/GA.In a way supplements quite a number of svc going Tampines too..Will be some sort of svc 46..

TIB987K SG

Im afraid its not SBST but LTA/GA.In a way supplements quite a number of svc going Tampines too..Will be some sort of svc 46..

Maybe its GA Service 68?

carbikebus SG

Maybe its GA Service 68?

đđ˝đđ˝đđ˝âđžď¸đŞđťâđźď¸đđž

array88 SG

3 Sawtooth Berth... 1 Alighting Berth

20 Parking Bay...

My opinion of the services that might use the interchange would be:

75, 176, 184, 700/700A, 920, 922, 970, 971E, 972, 975, 979/979M

177 is with Tower Transit so become loop...
180 will also loop around the interchange...
983 will loop as it is so short route and terminate at CCK...

If 180 loops there might as well let SBST operate...

Never mind, we have GCM.

array88 SG

New bus stops spotted right outside Tampines Interchange.

For svcs that will be terminating at Int Extension to stop so commuters can alight at that bus stop for convenience?

Not sure if the public will be pleased by the long walking distance from MRT to that bus stop...

iveco SG

I prefer 52 go to TT instead of 66 due to distance

52 and 105 should have gone to TT instead of the CLE routes.

21 and 109 should have gone to GAG instead of 3 and 136.

169 should be included in the Seletar contract.

carbikebus SG

52 and 105 should have gone to TT instead of the CLE routes.

21 and 109 should have gone to GAG instead of 3 and 136.

169 should be included in the Seletar contract.

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

201911 SG

not sure if anyone has mentioned, container office at taman jurong ter has been removed

SBS3004X SG

52 and 105 should have gone to TT instead of the CLE routes.

21 and 109 should have gone to GAG instead of 3 and 136.

169 should be included in the Seletar contract.

But 52 and 105 no BBDEP...

5 to Loyang would be better.

And why 3 cannot? Is Tampines that far from Loyang Depot?

SMB145B SG

should make Tampines into Loyang package rather than Punggol

« Previous Page Next Page »