I used to frequent on Svc 76...
The frequency when waiting for Svc 76 is quite horrendous.. 25
minutes and then aft I alight at my stop, there is the next bus
like 2 minutes away...
I also boarded 76 towards YCK from Marine Parade... Only very
minimal passengers alight at Paya Lebar as there are other services
which can bring them to the MRT Station (43/135)...
To me, Svc 134 is bringing connectivity for Sims Drive residents
to Marine Parade/Parkway Parade & to East Coast Park, rather
than have to wait for Svc 853C to operate on Sundays/PH along the
stretch of Sims Ave...
Give it time and shall see how the loading is... Is the same
like Svc 47/117/118 when being introduced, you complain so much but
then loading wise... Slowly picking up...
I dunno whether you all see the rationale or you all just see it
as
"Amendment... Why amended... Nv consult residents, nv consult
bus enthusiast, Anyhow cut route... "
So I ask you all, when Svc 32 is being routed to Kay Siang
Road... Anyone make noise?
When Svc 120/121/122 being introduced, you all complain but end
result... loading is good as far as I seen...
For my side, Svc 805 is quite new but the flats there are almost
complete... Give time and see the loading, though I am still not
happy with the loading of Svc 860...
Have you seen 122's loading between NBR and Tiong Bahru?
The main reason for complaints about 120/121/122 are some of
their underutilised sectors and over-duplication with other
services, sometimes unnecessary.