New Bus Services Announced by LTA/PTOs (Part 2)

last SG · 2016-02-09T10:18:07+00:00

If you're here to encourage people to take the MRT above the public bus, I feel that you have come to the wrong forum. SGTrains was created for a reason.So i...

BusAnalayzer SG

I emailed to them regarding that.

Please post your question and reply. Thank you.

dupdup77 SG

LTA say sv 500 will NOT be introduced :-( #disappointedsengkangresident #tookanchiongliao #ltaasusual

Hi mr sbs6750E, as usual, rumours will always be rumours. Not only Sengkang residents will be disappointed, but also Punggol residents too. Disappointed. Cheers. Thanks.

iveco SG

to find a suitable terminus than random cuts to reduce journey time

Of course. What they did with 76 is still fresh in many people's minds

Sbs6750E SG

Hi mr sbs6750E, as usual, rumours will always be rumours. Not only Sengkang residents will be disappointed, but also Punggol residents too. Disappointed. Cheers. Thanks.

But Hgdep 103 quite trustworthy leh.

Sbs6750E SG

Hi mr sbs6750E, as usual, rumours will always be rumours. Not only Sengkang residents will be disappointed, but also Punggol residents too. Disappointed. Cheers. Thanks.

Boon Lay ppl also. Sibei cham lah.

SMB5007J SG

500 passes by city right? there's a trunk route

Vampire77lim SG

Lta feedback is not used for the suggestion of the bus service network lta still not working on the suggestion

That the Lta cannot make it Sent to the planning officers that not use to work on the suggestion at the email

Lta not consideration to the suggestion

wsy1234 SG

Lta feedback is not used for the suggestion of the bus service network lta still not working on the suggestion

That the Lta cannot make it Sent to the planning officers that not use to work on the suggestion at the email

Lta not consideration to the suggestion

the feed back will feed back to the bus operators.

SBS3004X SG

What is wrong with LTA?

LTA QoS Standard 4.2: (From Land Transport Guru, the original one on PTC website has been taken down)

4.2: Provision of direct bus service connections

To run direct bus services:

SBS Transit has not provided any direct bus or MRT service between Hougang/Sengkang/Punggol and Jurong Industrial Estate for so many years before BCM, and has not been fined for that?

Subject to minimum demand is not an excuse because it is not 1 town but 3. LTA can easily introduce a bus service from Sengkang/Punggol to Boon Lay via TPE/SLE/BKE/KJE.

Seriously? Not even a service plying TPE/SLE/BKE/KJE?

SMB145B SG

with 500, it leaves Punggol without a link to Jurong Industrial.

in addition, it also lacks a link to CBD, not counting CDS.

Sbs6750E SG

500 passes by city right? there's a trunk route

Trunk from Sengkang to CBD ah? We don't mind also as long it plies expressway and full day can liao.

Sbs6750E SG

with 500, it leaves Punggol without a link to Jurong Industrial.

in addition, it also lacks a link to CBD, not counting CDS.

500 high chance cannot happen already.

dupdup77 SG

But Hgdep 103 quite trustworthy leh.

Hi mr sbs6750E, yes I understand hgdep103 is very trustworthy. But do you doubt LTA reply to you? Cheers. Thanks.

Sbs6750E SG

Hi mr sbs6750E, yes I understand hgdep103 is very trustworthy. But do you doubt LTA reply to you? Cheers. Thanks.

just wait and see lor.

TPS Timothy Mok SG

What is wrong with LTA?

LTA QoS Standard 4.2: (From Land Transport Guru, the original one on PTC website has been taken down)

4.2: Provision of direct bus service connections

To run direct bus services:

SBS Transit has not provided any direct bus or MRT service between Hougang/Sengkang/Punggol and Jurong Industrial Estate for so many years before BCM, and has not been fined for that?

Subject to minimum demand is not an excuse because it is not 1 town but 3. LTA can easily introduce a bus service from Sengkang/Punggol to Boon Lay via TPE/SLE/BKE/KJE.

Seriously? Not even a service plying TPE/SLE/BKE/KJE?

No.

This is far too long nowadays, which nowadays you don't see a bus service from Joo Koon to Simei, or Tuas Industrial Estate to Punggol, and maybe MRT Rationalisation.

SMB145B SG

500 high chance cannot happen already.

hmm shift their targets everywhere. where's the standard ah?

orange28 SG

What is wrong with LTA?

LTA QoS Standard 4.2: (From Land Transport Guru, the original one on PTC website has been taken down)

4.2: Provision of direct bus service connections

To run direct bus services:

SBS Transit has not provided any direct bus or MRT service between Hougang/Sengkang/Punggol and Jurong Industrial Estate for so many years before BCM, and has not been fined for that?

Subject to minimum demand is not an excuse because it is not 1 town but 3. LTA can easily introduce a bus service from Sengkang/Punggol to Boon Lay via TPE/SLE/BKE/KJE.

Seriously? Not even a service plying TPE/SLE/BKE/KJE?

I don't see the problem since LTA got cover their backside with the last point (in red). If only got small to non-existent demand, and there's the MRT anyway, then why need a bus service? Do you want to pay for the operation of running such a bus service?

gekpohboy SG

Lta feedback is not used for the suggestion of the bus service network lta still not working on the suggestion

That the Lta cannot make it Sent to the planning officers that not use to work on the suggestion at the email

Lta not consideration to the suggestion

LTA never accepts suggestion. They will always find ways to reject it.

gekpohboy SG

LTA say sv 500 will NOT be introduced :-( #disappointedsengkangresident #tookanchiongliao #ltaasusual

What if, they decided to use another number? :)

Dream on.

SBS3004X SG

The whole North-East region lacks a direct connection to CCK/BPJ as well. Not even a direct MRT connection.

BPJ has too many bus services to city, but lacks connections to East and North-East regions. CCK only has the very winding service 67.

« Previous Page Next Page »