One more problem with the Citaros might be the acceleration.
Generally, Citaros do not have good pickup speed, but yes, after
the 2nd or 3rd gear, they can go pretty fast already. Worse, SBST
down-tunes their Citaros, making the acceleration much, much
weaker. The SBST ones also seem to be struggling a lot at 60km/h
and the aircon system, well... it's powerful but very noisy and I
think it's due to overworking of the bus again
...
The SMRT ones on the other hand don't seem to be struggling to
accelerate or working too hard at 60km/h though, that's because
SMRT did not down tune these buses.
One more problem might be due to the Citaros using Voith DIWA
D854.5 gearboxes. Voith gearboxes usually have weaker acceleration
and top speed than ZF or Allison gearboxes. This problem also
occured in the MK3s as in, they struggled to accelerate but are
fine after the 2nd gear, but the acceleration wasn't as weak as the
Citaros. I would prefer if they used ZF Ecomat 6HP 592C or ZF
Ecolife gearboxes instead. The Voiths can be reserved for the buses
with higher torque power.
Lastly, the aisle is quite squeezy and narrow, thus people
refused to move in...
... They shouldn't be deployed on high demand
services but rather low demand services like 123, 272, 273, 275,
408 etc. Plus the Citaros' brakes aren't really that effective...
People also don't find the Citaro seats comfortable due to the lack
of cushion...
But other than that, I think they are great buses
,
don't you just love the feel of a Citaro on the expressway??? Or
maybe riding a Citaro driving through the rain, haha
!!!
Did SBST really down tune the engine? How many BHP does it have
then? If it's true, that's just silly, like buying underpowered
KUBs which tend to shift way too early. The braking only feels weak
because of the lack of sharp action from the disc brakes like on
the KUBs. Instead Citaros like many European configured buses make
heavy use of the retarder, and on the Batch 2 Citaros, the engine
brake instead of the disc brakes to reduce brake wear. The disc
brakes are hence less powerful. Regarding the design of the aisle,
nothing can be done on a low floor bus. The wheel arches must be
there and the aisle is as wide as on B10Ms. It's just that the
smaller area compared to the standee area in the middle gives the
illusion that it is extremely narrow. It's narrow, but still
acceptable. It's more of a commuter problem refusing to move in,
just like how close to no one moves up the steps on a KUB to stand.
That's why I've always been saying LTA should ask the PTCs to buy
3-door buses to encourage commuters to move in.